Re: Does the issue of nuclear weapons need to be addressed?
- From: David <pchristainsen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 08:40:49 -0700
On Aug 14, 2:45 am, John <j...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
David wrote:
Still, as a voter in the upcoming 2008 American Presidential Election,
I will favor a businessman over a military man.
Well there you are, as you've already made up your mind, there is no issue
to address.
--
John
"Who is John Galt"
You are anti-conversation because your thinking is too rigid and
highly
irritating to your correspondent.
You are and always were light years from understanding my mentality.
Still and yet, even you could be redeemed hypothetically.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Does the issue of nuclear weapons need to be addressed?
- From: David
- Re: Does the issue of nuclear weapons need to be addressed?
- From: David
- Re: Does the issue of nuclear weapons need to be addressed?
- From: Engineer
- Re: Does the issue of nuclear weapons need to be addressed?
- From: David
- Re: Does the issue of nuclear weapons need to be addressed?
- From: John
- Re: Does the issue of nuclear weapons need to be addressed?
- From: David
- Re: Does the issue of nuclear weapons need to be addressed?
- From: John
- Does the issue of nuclear weapons need to be addressed?
- Prev by Date: Re: update fast
- Next by Date: Re: Does the issue of nuclear weapons need to be addressed?
- Previous by thread: Re: Does the issue of nuclear weapons need to be addressed?
- Next by thread: Re: Does the issue of nuclear weapons need to be addressed?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
