Re: Does the issue of nuclear weapons need to be addressed?
- From: David <pchristainsen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:40:05 -0700
On Aug 13, 3:45 pm, John <j...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
David wrote:
You did not do any addressing of the issue of nuclear weapons.
What are your views? As you state that you are no longer an "absolute
pacifist", have they, your views, altered as a result of your no longer
being an "absolute pacifist"?
How do you address "the issue of nuclear weapons", in particular what is
the, "the issue of nuclear weapons", they exist, and cannot
be 'un-invented'!
--
John
"Who is John Galt"
My background as an undergraduate was in political science.
I already stated we cannot turn back the clock. So, I agree they
cannot
be uninvented.
Still, as a voter in the upcoming 2008 American Presidential Election,
I
will favor a businessman over a military man.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Does the issue of nuclear weapons need to be addressed?
- From: David
- Re: Does the issue of nuclear weapons need to be addressed?
- From: David
- Re: Does the issue of nuclear weapons need to be addressed?
- From: Engineer
- Re: Does the issue of nuclear weapons need to be addressed?
- From: David
- Re: Does the issue of nuclear weapons need to be addressed?
- From: John
- Does the issue of nuclear weapons need to be addressed?
- Prev by Date: update fast
- Next by Date: Re: update fast
- Previous by thread: Re: Does the issue of nuclear weapons need to be addressed?
- Next by thread: Re: Does the issue of nuclear weapons need to be addressed?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
