Re: Re there is no such thing as Quakerism
- From: "Ian Johnston" <ian.groups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Aug 2005 17:25:22 GMT
On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 13:28:47 UTC, Marshall Massey
<mmassey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
: I do not fear anything. I merely point out that the established
: definition of the term "Quaker" is "member of the Religious Society of
: Friends", a fact that anyone here can verify simply by looking at a
: dictionary. Those on this list who quarrel with that definition are
: not quarreling with me, they are quarreling with standard, established
: usage. If Ian Johnston cannot accept the reality of that standard,
: established meaning of "Quaker", that is not my problem but his.
Dictionary schmictionary. Over here (UK) we generally have no problem
with attenders being Quakers. If it is different where you are, that's
fine, of course.
Ian
--
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re there is no such thing as Quakerism
- From: Marshall Massey
- Re: Re there is no such thing as Quakerism
- From: Ian Davis
- Re: Re there is no such thing as Quakerism
- References:
- Re: Re there is no such thing as Quakerism
- From: Marshall Massey
- Re: Re there is no such thing as Quakerism
- From: Ian Johnston
- Re: Re there is no such thing as Quakerism
- From: Ian Davis
- Re: Re there is no such thing as Quakerism
- From: Marshall Massey
- Re: Re there is no such thing as Quakerism
- Prev by Date: Re: Re there is no such thing as Quakerism
- Next by Date: Re: Re there is no such thing as Quakerism
- Previous by thread: Re: Re there is no such thing as Quakerism
- Next by thread: Re: Re there is no such thing as Quakerism
- Index(es):