Re: I heard about this showing of Jesus on the news.

The sincerity of this poster may be judged from the fact that he
changed the header so that any reply would be sent to another group.
Sadly for him, I noticed.

I don't have much time for the sort of anonymous poster who posts a
whole load of lies, but of course people often simply repost, in good
faith, nonsense they see elsewhere.

But when challenged, the honest men step back and ask what happened.
The liars start a fight. This poster is a liar.

Engineer wrote:
> roger_pearse@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> >Engineer wrote:
> >
> >> roger_pearse@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >>
> >>>> Josephus, Antiquities XVIII,Ch.3,sec.3.. Lardner translation:
> >>
> >> >What an old-fashioned translation! Particularly since the last phrase
> >> >should read [snip]
> >>
> >> Please provide evidence that you are better qualified to translate
> >> than Nathaniel Lardner was or that you are quoting without attribution
> >> someone who is better qualified to translate than Nathaniel Lardner was.
> >
> ><chuckle>
> >
> >That's right, lad
>
> Sarcasm noted.

Funny how the dishonest love to hand it out, but can't take it.

> > -- stick to 17th century versions. After all, modern
> >ones would only spoil your case.
>
> You have failed to provide evidence that you are better qualified
> to translate than Nathaniel Lardner was, and you have not actually
> named a modern translator that you prefer.

You have not produced evidence that you are not a paedophile either.
No doubt you have a reason, as I do.

> I presume that this is
> because all the modern translators you checked agree with the Ladner
> translation and disagree with yours.

I'm sure. After all, you could actually *find out*. But you prefer to
assert this instead.

Lie #1 noted.

> >> >I should add that these words are actually *mine* -- but some anonymous
> >> >Christian-hater (evident from the final words of that paragraph) has
> >> >removed the remainder of what I wrote, which stated that the majority
> >> >hold a view in between. This is why a wiki is worthless on a matter of
> >> >controversy, on which most people are better equipped with prejudices
> >> >than information.
> >>
> >> [1] Wikipedia is not the same thing a Wiki.
> >
> >Be serious.
>
> Evasion noted. Wikipedia is not the same thing a Wiki.

Wikipedia is not a wiki?

Lie #2 noted.

> >> [2] Wikepedia entries are not anonymous. Exactly who wrote what
> >> and when they wrote it is logged.
> >
> >ROTFL!
>
> Evasion noted. Wikepedia entries are not anonymous. Exactly who
> wrote what and when they wrote it is logged.

Impudence noted. It's hard to tell whether this is ignorance or just
dishonesty. I think we'll give the poster the benefit of the doubt,
and presume he really doesn't know that anyone can post to wikipedia.

> >> [3] You have accused a Wikepedia editor of plagiarism - a serious
> >> charge. Please provide evidence that the words are yours and
> >> I will bring them before the Wikipedia editorial board.
> >
> >Why don't you call the police also?
>
> Evasion noted. You have accused a Wikepedia editor of plagiarism - a
> serious charge - and have no evidence that the words are yours.

A manufactured accusation, again -- anything rather than discuss the
topic.

Lie #3.

> >Be serious.
>
> Evasion noted. You are in violation of the 9th commandment (Thou
> shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour) by making a
> false accusation of plagiarism. You have falsely claimed that
> the words of another were yours. I suggest that you repent.

A new manufactured accusation on top of the last one.

Lie #4.

> You are now in my killfile. Because of my software filters, I will
> not see anything that you post from now on. Life is too short to
> waste any time on someone who makes claims that he cannot back up.
> Have fun shouting into an empty hall.

Failure to mention change of headers noted.

Dishonesty #5.

> *plonk*

-er.

So here we have it. First the post of a load of second-hand lies about
Josephus, and then the manufacture of a load of crass lies and personal
abuse, various deliberate lies, and an act of deliberate dishonesty.

<chuckle>

All the best,

Roger Pearse

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Renli & Romeo Rose head to head!
    ... points by showing the world that I'm better than another poster, ... Please post evidence of known lies posted by me, ... Please provide evidence of surreptitious post-editing by me (the ... post-edited quotes. ...
    (alt.guitar)
  • OT: How many denials... Was - Re: How many laptop owners...
    ... He also openly lies about me, such as his lies that I posted what Carroll ... I wonder if the person (poster B) who wrote the following admission ... quotes of context and make it look like views have changed... ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: OT: Who is the stupidest RGP poster? Day 10
    ... since I have documented your lies for all to ... It must really piss you off that ruylopez, MBBJ, as well as Bill T, ... another intelligent poster, ...
    (rec.gambling.poker)
  • Thanks for gravestone translations
    ... time to translate the long Hebrew epitaphs on the ... I'm used to seeing the standard "here lies so and so, ... son of so and so" on Jewish gravestones, ... In all of his deeds he was modest and quiet (that is ...
    (soc.genealogy.jewish)
  • BEHIND EVERY FILTHY POST IS A FILTHY MUZZIE POSTER
    ... BEHIND EVERY FILTHY POST IS A FILTHY MUZZIE POSTER ... Inaccurate, Full of lies, Stupid posts, Lunatic stories, obscene language. ...
    (alt.religion.islam)
Loading