Re: FREEMASONRY - Should we ignore this connection or not?
- From: "Gene Fuller" <gfuller1930_not_@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 14:08:58 -0000
<millerjamesc@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:11nlbijl9u2qqb9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Gene Fuller wrote:
>> > On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 16:51:26 -0000, Stormin Mormon wrote:
>> >
>> >>As I heard it, the LDS temple ceremonies are the restoration of the old
>> >>ceremonies. Perhaps shortened or modified slightly.
>> >
>> > Reference?
>>
>> He simply said "As I heard it". Probably his only reference is his
>> memory.
>> <G>
>
> I suggest that this is how Folk Mormonisms are spread and how they fill
> out into the church membership.
I think you are correct. One man says, I think maybe 50 angels can dance on
the head of a pin. One who heard him reports "I heard it said that as many
of 5 or 60 angels can dance on the head of a pin". after a while it is up to
I heard a general authority once said that 1,000 angels can dance on the
head of a pin with room to spare". Nest someone comes onto a news- group and
says, "The Mormon Church is inconsistent. On the one hand it teaches that
some angels are the unembodied spirits of men who will come to earth, and
have the same size and form they will have in mortality, yet it teaches also
that 5,000 of these can fit on the head of a pin."
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: FREEMASONRY - Should we ignore this connection or not?
- From: millerjamesc
- Re: FREEMASONRY - Should we ignore this connection or not?
- References:
- FREEMASONRY - Should we ignore this connection or not?
- From: Radial
- Re: FREEMASONRY - Should we ignore this connection or not?
- From: Gene Fuller
- Re: FREEMASONRY - Should we ignore this connection or not?
- From: Radial
- Re: FREEMASONRY - Should we ignore this connection or not?
- From: Stormin Mormon
- Re: FREEMASONRY - Should we ignore this connection or not?
- From: John S. Colton
- Re: FREEMASONRY - Should we ignore this connection or not?
- From: Gene Fuller
- Re: FREEMASONRY - Should we ignore this connection or not?
- From: millerjamesc
- FREEMASONRY - Should we ignore this connection or not?
- Prev by Date: Re: FREEMASONRY - Should we ignore this connection or not?
- Next by Date: Re: D&C (132:15-16,18) - the covenant of marriage
- Previous by thread: Re: FREEMASONRY - Should we ignore this connection or not?
- Next by thread: Re: FREEMASONRY - Should we ignore this connection or not?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|