Re: faith, and induction as an argument (a troll is a troll)
- From: joseph_daniel_zukiger@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 01:46:47 -0000
The Poster Formerly Known as Craig Olson wrote:
> [...]
> [Note: I also see the "critic" and "apologist" roles as a continuum,
> with a middle ground where one can be both and neither at the same
> time. But then I sort of reject binary as a decent number system for
> human interactions, anyway.]
> [...]
I think binary is just fine, as long as there are enough bits for good
resolution. (64 bits in several vectors would be good for many
purposes. ;=)
.
- References:
- faith, and induction as an argument
- From: joseph_daniel_zukiger
- Re: faith, and induction as an argument (a troll is a troll)
- From: Gazelem
- Re: faith, and induction as an argument (a troll is a troll)
- From: millerjamesc
- Re: faith, and induction as an argument (a troll is a troll)
- From: The Poster Formerly Known as Craig Olson
- Re: faith, and induction as an argument (a troll is a troll)
- From: millerjamesc
- Re: faith, and induction as an argument (a troll is a troll)
- From: The Poster Formerly Known as Craig Olson
- faith, and induction as an argument
- Prev by Date: Re: BOM prophets all from Manasseh?
- Next by Date: Re: faith, and induction as an argument (a troll is _not_ a troll)
- Previous by thread: Re: faith, and induction as an argument (a troll is a troll)
- Next by thread: Re: faith, and induction as an argument (a troll is _not_ a troll)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|