Re: faith, and induction as an argument (a troll is a troll)


The Poster Formerly Known as Craig Olson wrote:

> [Note: I also see the "critic" and "apologist" roles as a continuum,
> with a middle ground where one can be both and neither at the same
> time.

Certainly, but just as with the light spectrum, we still maintain
distinct names for specific colors along that spectrum because it is
useful to keep separate names for such colors as red and green and blue
and yellow.

> But then I sort of reject binary as a decent number system for
> human interactions, anyway.]

Doesn't maintaining this position for you require you to disavow the
LDS position on gender and sexual orientation?

James Clifford Miller
millerjamesc@xxxxxxx

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: faith, and induction as an argument (a troll is a troll)
    ... > The Poster Formerly Known as Craig Olson wrote: ... >>with a middle ground where one can be both and neither at the same ... > Certainly, but just as with the light spectrum, we still maintain ... > LDS position on gender and sexual orientation? ...
    (soc.religion.mormon)
  • Re: faith, and induction as an argument (a troll is a troll)
    ... >> The Poster Formerly Known as Craig Olson wrote: ... > What is the LDS position on gender and sexual orientation? ... Besides, he said, "sort of reject" not "totally reject under all ...
    (soc.religion.mormon)