Re: faith, and induction as an argument (a troll is a troll)
- From: The Poster Formerly Known as Craig Olson <craigBLOCK@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 13:12:59 -0000
millerjamesc@xxxxxxx wrote:
> Gazelem wrote:
>
>>4. Be honest in asking: Are you open to accepting the response as true, or
>>have you decided the answer is false before a word is written?
>
>
> Does this mean apologists should be open to a critic's response as
> true?
Is there an implication that apologists are not open to new truth?
Craig, who equates a closed mind with an uncluttered desk
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: faith, and induction as an argument (a troll is a troll)
- From: millerjamesc
- Re: faith, and induction as an argument (a troll is a troll)
- References:
- faith, and induction as an argument
- From: joseph_daniel_zukiger
- Re: faith, and induction as an argument (a troll is a troll)
- From: Gazelem
- Re: faith, and induction as an argument (a troll is a troll)
- From: millerjamesc
- faith, and induction as an argument
- Prev by Date: Re: ... knows you better than you know yourself ...
- Next by Date: Re: Events out of our Control?
- Previous by thread: Re: faith, and induction as an argument (a troll is a troll)
- Next by thread: Re: faith, and induction as an argument (a troll is a troll)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|