Re: faith, and induction as an argument (a troll is a troll)
- From: millerjamesc@xxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 12:11:34 -0000
Gazelem wrote:
>
> 4. Be honest in asking: Are you open to accepting the response as true, or
> have you decided the answer is false before a word is written?
Does this mean apologists should be open to a critic's response as
true?
James Clifford Miller
millerjamesc@xxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: faith, and induction as an argument (a troll is a troll)
- From: The Poster Formerly Known as Craig Olson
- Re: faith, and induction as an argument (a troll is a troll)
- From: David Bowie
- Re: faith, and induction as an argument (a troll is a troll)
- From: gary0
- Re: faith, and induction as an argument (a troll is a troll)
- References:
- faith, and induction as an argument
- From: joseph_daniel_zukiger
- Re: faith, and induction as an argument (a troll is a troll)
- From: Gazelem
- faith, and induction as an argument
- Prev by Date: Re: Gospel Fundamentals - building the New Jerusalem
- Next by Date: Re: Gospel Fundamentals - building the New Jerusalem
- Previous by thread: Re: faith, and induction as an argument (a troll is a troll)
- Next by thread: Re: faith, and induction as an argument (a troll is a troll)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|