Re: JS-History 1:19
- From: "John S. Colton" <colton.idislikespam.john@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:49:26 -0000
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 07:01:37 -0000, Jeff Shirton wrote:
[snip]
>As I've said previously, I have no *need* to define "god", since
>I allow LDS to do that themselves, when they interpret the Scriptures,
>"Ye are gods", etc., and when they make their own assertions,
>"we are gods in embryo".
>
>Whatever definition of "god[s]" LDS use, LDS obviously (by the
>form of the word) believe in *plural* "gods", and that is "polytheism".
[snip]
By this argument, a lot of the Biblical authors(*) would qualify as
polytheists. I count 215 instances of the word "gods" being used in
the Bible.
John
(*) Not to mention traditionalists like CS Lewis whom I've brought up
before.
*****
John's newsgroup motto:
"A soft answer turneth away wrath:
but grievous words stir up anger." --Prov. 15:1
*****
.
- References:
- Re: JS-History 1:19
- From: Jeff Shirton
- Re: JS-History 1:19
- Prev by Date: Re: Couple of interesting facts--
- Next by Date: Re: Missed a step (was A Rose ... was a Temple Recommend...)
- Previous by thread: defining God and gods
- Next by thread: Re: JS-History 1:19
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading