Re: Millat and its natural dire consequences?
- From: "Zuiko Azumazi" <azumazi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 13:52:53 CST
"John Eritsu" <Eritsu@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:derhrj$d2k$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<snip> ...
Salaam John,
> Here we go again. Angle to me implied only a way of looking at a topic. It
> did not imply an agenda or a thesis that must be established and
> promulgated.
<snip> ...
Comment:-
If you are using the word "angle" in the way you describe, then there isn't
any problem between us. Too many posts in SRI end up being protracted
'verbal disputes' over the use of words between Muslims. Unfortunately, many
subscribers wouldn't have given the same 'use' as yourself. I glad this has
been clarified.
To 'understand as well as being understood' isn't an Islamic innovation as
some Muslim 'pundits' would have us believe.
--
Peace
--
For a large class of cases -though not for all - in which we employ the word
meaning it can be defined thus: the meaning of a word is its use in the
language. [Ludwig Wittgenstein]
Zuiko Azumazi
azumazi@xxxxxxxxxxx
.
- References:
- Millat and its natural dire consequences?
- From: Zuiko Azumazi
- Re: Millat and its natural dire consequences?
- From: John Eritsu
- Re: Millat and its natural dire consequences?
- From: Zuiko Azumazi
- Re: Millat and its natural dire consequences?
- From: John Eritsu
- Millat and its natural dire consequences?
- Prev by Date: Re: Salman Rushdie on "Muslim Reformation"
- Next by Date: Re: Boddy-Mind problem
- Previous by thread: Re: Millat and its natural dire consequences?
- Next by thread: Re: Millat and its natural dire consequences?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|