Re: Scientific method to reject "proof" of Allah being not almighty

3 | 46
When the angels said, `O Mary, ALLAH gives thee glad tidings of a son
through a word from HIM; his name shall be the Messiah, Jesus, son of
Mary, honoured in this world and in the next, and of those who Are
Granted Nearness to God;

3 | 47
`And he shall speak to the people in the cradle, and when of middle
age, and he shall be of the righteous.

3 | 48
She said, `My Lord, how shall I have a son, when no man has touch me ?
He said, `Such is the way of ALLAH. HE creates what HE pleases. When HE
decrees a thing HE says to it `Be,' and it is;

...

38 | 85
ALLAH Said

The Truth Is
and The Truth alone I speak



Mr. Giron,

The ultimate issue at hand, a Purposive and Guided Existence, is *far*
too serious an issue for a 'reasonable' biped (hairy or otherwise) to
approach using such (banal) word-games.

By trivializing this (ultimate) question, you are merely 'demeaning'
(in the precise sense of the word) your own existence.

If ~A~ "creates" x ...:

What is the context of this creation? Is it the plane of materiality?
If yes, then please note your 'cognitive limits' in regards to making
assertions regarding any 'content'/'object' of the said context as
regards to its 'boundary conditions'/'limits'.

Even your own fellow god-less materialists who *dare* to approach these
'limits' do so under the 'Guidance' of some asserted 'Higher Law'

(otherwise they would be laughed in their face -- as it is now, they
are merely laughed at behind their backs ..).

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=m-theory&btnG=Google+Search

Here in the case of 'm-theory', your fellow bipeds are 'placing their
trust' on a so-far-un-contested (yet *inexplicable*) symmetry between
Mathematical Constructs/"laws" and scientifically derived
theories/"laws" governing the *material* universe.

You, on the other hand, are entirely trivializing matters (somewhat
childishly if I may add) by seeking 'truth' based on a disrespect of
Reason, and, a denial of your limitations.

?Why? should 'a
contradition-that-can-not-be-but-i-say-must-be-for-me-to believe'
inform the ultimate question of Mankind?

?Who? -- or rather what type of biped (hairy or otherwise) -- would
waste time with such things?

Simply ponder the consequences of:

a) "Being" in context of an ultimately meaningless 'existence'
b) "Being" in context of an ultimately Meaningfull 'existence'

I have reached my own conclusions. (a) indicates a locally 'evil'
universe where the ultimate 'truth' available to *any* sentient is
Power/Pleasure, and, the Continuity of the Super-Organism the only
'sacred' 'given'. (Anything else is a superstition .. don't kid
yourselves ..)

(b) is the kind of Universe I want to inhabit.

You don't like (b)? Move to (a) and suffer ...

/wa Salaam

-- notes --

* Here is another one:

Can God "create" a non-zero number, n, so that n + 1 = n? Ponder that.
And you know what? There IS such an n. It is denoted as 'oo', and
named as "infinity".

Do you get the '.' Mr. Giron?

"Mommy, can god create a married bachelor?"

"Don't be silly dear. These are terms for 2 distinct 'states' in a
unity of an adult male, as far as we can tell. And these phases of a
male's life aren't "created": they are 'consequences' of a choice made
to leave one state and enter into another. And even if God were to
create such a 'superposition' of these 2 contradictory states, well ...
He Does as He Pleases ... but clearly 'that superposition of states'
would *confound* our ability to 'comprehend' the 'state' of the said
male, would it not?"

"hmm, you mean, mommy, that even if He Did we wouldn't be able to
'observe' it?"

"That right sweetheart"

"and so, just because I can 'say something' it doesn't mean it is
meaningful?"

"That's exactly right honey [carresses his head with affection] God,
you had me worried there for a second ... now why don't you run along
and play with your toys azizam (my dear) ... I've got a few things to
attend to here ..."

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: An argument against modus ponens
    ... The "If" announces a truth value. ... TOGETHER name ONE well-defined binary boolean function. ... "then..") immediately launches us into a context where "if P" yields P as true or not true. ... It ought to go WITHOUT saying that we are presupposing the existence ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time
    ... feeling today is that change is essential to all being, and persistence ... is due to special and temporary circumstances that need explanation, ... stability or is it putting the question to objective existence? ... truth nor that what is "currently thought" is correct. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: syllogism
    ... >The term definitive refers to objectively stated criteria for truth ... not a problem in those groups because posters have a sense ... variation of "analysis" to describe what is largely ambiguity? ... the context is always obvious, ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: GRU driver feedback
    ... "atomic pte lookup" which looks up the pte atomically using similar ... Existence of the mm is guaranteed thru an indirect path. ... struct cannot go away until the GRU context that caused the interrupt ... When the GRU hardware sends an interrupt, ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: Settle a debate: running & muscle building
    ... And the direct context here, per the quote way up at the top, was ... just said or whether it bore any relation to the truth. ... removed from the language, there would be less belief in the ... Used as a verb, I have a sliver of sympathy for your viewpoint. ...
    (rec.running)