Re: No such thing as "Islamic Terror" or "Islamic Terrorism"
- From: "Mike" <atonement1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 18 Jul 2005 04:00:27 GMT
Altway wrote:
> It can be argued that they are lining up to find a job because
> they are unemployed and desperate the Invaders having destroyed their
> means of livelihood.
It can also be argued that they have always been unemployed or had
menial jobs so that the previous regime could suppress the majority and
that they see this as a way of participating in running the country.
> There could be patriots who think of them as collaoborators with the enemy.
> Is it not a US puppet government that has been set up in Iraq?
There seem to be facts about a Sunni minority imposing its will by
force upon a majority of Kurds and Shiites which lead to many more
deaths on a massive basis than has occurred since the invasion. It
could well be that the new majority see -themselves- as patriots and
the -minority- as collaborators and puppets of a psychopathic terrorist
organisation and that they have no intension of allowing that minority
to resume their evil ways again with or without the terrorist Invaders,
who are doing even more to destroy the country's means of livlihood.
> Is it not meant to prevent the arising of an Islamic System?
> Was it not set up under the power of an overwhelming US military force
> and the biggest US Embassy?
What exactly is the Islamic System you propose that should be set up.
Is it the same as the terrorist's proposal? Would you say that
Malaysia's model is not valid and perhaps the Sudanese one is?
Was it not the Ottoman Turks who originally occupied Iraq with
overwhelming military force and that it was a western force that freed
them from that yoke? Are you implying that it's OK for a Muslim
country to occupy another Muslim state?
>
> Did not the US insist that Syrian forces should be withdrawn from Lebanon
> in order that free election could be held there? The Syrian forces did
> withdraw.
> Did the US forces withdraw from Iraq? No.
How many years were the Syrians occupying Lebanon compared with how
long American forces have been in Iraq? Was it not the case that
Lebanon did not want to be a puppet of Syria? Would Syria have
withdrawn if America had not exerted influence? Probably not.
> So is it any wonder that the US government is regarded as a Hypocrite
> that cannot be trusted and that collaborators with it are condemned?
Is it any wonder that terrorists who call themselves Muslims are
regarded as hypocrites and cannot be trusted and that those who tacitly
support them with their arguments could be condemned as collaborators?
> But yes, the terrorists are doing wrong in targetting inocent people
> instead of the Invaders as is the right of all people.
But yes the Americans would be wrong if they deliberately targeted
innocent people instead of the terrorist invaders.
> And are being counter productive. It is necessary that there should be
> political stability in Iraq so that foreign troops can leave and Iraqis
> can be free to control their own affairs.
Agreed.
> But the fear is that the Invaders will not leave until they have created
> irreversible puppet state that will serve US Capitalist interests.
I doubt if that would be possible. Iran is testament to that. I would
suggest that -most of the world- would have capalist interests in Iraq
with the oil possition as it is.
It is not for me to support American interests or policies and of
course, most of the above statements are either suppositions or
rhetorical questions. They don't really give any real facts. What is
needed is an input from Muslims in Iraq who are actually involved.
There is too much propaganda and disinformation to form -any- valid
conclusions.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Terrorist bombing in London
- Next by Date: Re: Full moon of "ramadan"
- Previous by thread: Re: No such thing as "Islamic Terror" or "Islamic Terrorism"
- Next by thread: Re: No such thing as "Islamic Terror" or "Islamic Terrorism"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
