Re: Re: When A Homosexual Christian Leader 'Comes O

In article <HrI7j.17656$dX.17185@trnddc08>, shegeek72 says...

On Dec 5, 5:54 pm, the suspect Matthew Johnson
<matthew_mem...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
No, the _Church_ has always stuck with one 'paradigm', the one
revealed by Christ.

The 'one paradigm' may be Christ,

That is not what I said. Do you confuse the adjectives for color with
those for flavor, too?

but church doctrine has varied widely over time. One obvious example:
the church's opposition to Galileo's radical, but correct, ideas.

Why do you keep returning to the example of Galieo, as if it supported
you? It does not.

But judging from the filth taught as 'truth' in your post and
article, it seems you have never learned that one paradigm yet.

Ah yes, the newsgroup's insult dog. You are quick to lambast someone,
yet seldom provide documentation to back up your claims.

This is not true. The only time I fail to provide the documentation is
when it is too painfully obvious. It is you who fails to provide
documentation, unless it is the 'documentation' of pseudo-scholars
such as John Boswell. As for "insult dog", you have surpassed me there
with your puerile methods of starting posts with 'Doris' or "the
suspect".

For unlike my alleged 'insults', these puerile openings contribute
nothing to the post other than insult. They are far from "constructive
criticism", even further away from the biblically sanctioned
'rebuke'. They are pure insult, and particularly childish insult at
that.

These are not 'paradigm shifts', either. So why are you distracting
the reader with these irrelevant issues? Is it because you are
slyly preparing the reader for your false analogy between these
"liberation movements" and the modern support for depravity?

The only 'depravity' is some Christian's ideas that homosexuality is
a 'sin', based on misinterpretation of biblical passages that results
in untold rejection, harm, ostracizing, murder and suicide of their
LGBT brothers and sisters.

So you love to repeat. But in case you didn't notice, some of us find
your repetition unconvincing. Once more: it is NOT
'misinterpretation'. It is the only possible legitimate
interpretation. Yours is the misintepretation. You cannot face the
truth about what MALAKOS or ARSENOKOITHS means in 1 Cor 6:9, so you
have to hide under vain repetition instead.

I've found that the less one socializes with and gets to know LGBT
people the more negative ideas they tend to hold.

Another of your favorite mantras. But all it proves is that the poet
was right when he said, "bad company ruins good morals (1 Cor
15:33). What _you_ are recommending here is that we give bad company a
free hand in corrupting good morals, and applaud them for it.

However, once one gets to know LGBT people and finds out they are
like everyone else, except for whom they choose to love or what
gender they want to be, their objections fall away and they come away
with a more humane and accepting attitude.

It is your attitude that is inhumane. For you condemn your associates
to deepening themselves in the sins that will damn them -- as if you
were hungry for company in your own damnation.

This "hit-and-run" style of posting, does not help your
credibility. Especially since you complain about others who "can't
cope with this sort of 'in your face' truthfulness", but can't take it
yourself. Otherwise you would not be hiding behind this "hit-and-run"
reference to a link.

Poor debating technique #34: Taking a person's statement, negatively
interpreting it and directing it back on the person. Often used when
one cannot come up with a valid rebuttal.

Well, we can certainly take your word for it, since you are the KING
of "poor debating techniques" in this NG;) Few others are as fond of
vain repetition of total nonsense. Yet you have done it yet again.

Knock it off with the vain repetition, come to terms with the facts
you have so long denied: the meaning of MALAKOS and ARSENOKOITHS in 1
Cor 6:9 is clear, it means people who engage in homosexual
activities. This truth _completely_ rules out your misinterpretation.


--
-----------------------------
Subducat se sibi ut haereat Deo
Quidquid boni habet tribuat illi a quo factus est
(Sanctus Aurelius Augustinus, Ser. 96)

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: IPAddress::Any vs. IPAddress::Broadcast
    ... >> while I do appreciate the answer in your second paragraph, ... People not reading tocumentation insult everyone they ask. ... therefor did not read the documentation. ... >> newsgroups. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.general)
  • Re: epoll design problems with common fork/exec patterns
    ... don't understand the problem or the documentation, so again, no need to ... I will update my english vocabulary and mark "missed" as an insult. ... But I have, at least, with epoll, as the documented ... as I would have to control an awful lot of code (think of an perl module ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: A new definition of natural numbers
    ... in particuls obvious misinterpretation of DA2 ... by tangible factual arguments without insult and hoity-toity phrases ... your incoherent ramblings, wild assertions, and appeals to dead ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: dollar sign and spaces from a string
    ... >> have no need to substantiate my claim on a semantical level. ... people who choose to insult and mock the poster. ... > documentation for Perl, and it's a little insulting when they don't ... Some people deserve insults due to their ...
    (comp.lang.perl.misc)
  • Re: A new definition of natural numbers
    ... in particuls obvious misinterpretation of DA2 ... Are you referring to WM's students? ... by tangible factual arguments without insult and hoity-toity phrases ... The Peano axioms? ...
    (sci.math)