Re: End Of The Illuminati

On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 04:41:45 GMT, "B.G. Kent" <ravynw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Steve Hayes wrote:

On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 00:29:58 GMT, Matthew Johnson <matthew_member@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

In article <Ezr0j.8245$Nz1.3317@trnddc06>, B.G. Kent says...

* Lucifer was not used in the Bible..and was the name given to light or
knowledge.

As usual, you are wrong here. 'Lucifer' is used in a very negative sense in one
passage (Isa 14:12) and a very positive sense in another (2 Pet 1;19).

And then, of course, there is Revelation 22:16.



B - are we talking the original scripts or the King James?

What difference does it make?

And no, I don't want to get into a discussion of the merits of different Bible
translations. I'm interested in discussion of the imagery of the "morning
star" (Eosphoros, Lucifer) in the Bible and in Christian theology.




--
Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
Web: http://hayesfam.bravehost.com/stevesig.htm
Blog: http://methodius.blogspot.com
E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

.

Relevant Pages