Re: 1932 Iran & Russia
- From: Steve Hayes <hayesmstw@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 03:22:22 GMT
On Thu, 09 Mar 2006 02:10:44 GMT, lsenders@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Matthew Johnson wrote:
But you still have not proven that the treaty even existed. I can find noI don't have to prove anything. I merely stated that I was shocked to
reference to it in a _responsible_ historical source.
here
of a treaty between Moscow and Persia (that is how my wife remembered
the statement.) Besides, why are you all upset about it other than I
made
the statement?
Because you made the statement as if it were true, and invited us to draw
conclusions from it as if it were true.
Some of us doubted the truth of the statement, which had all the marks of an
urban legend.
No you don't have to prove anything.
But prove all things, hold fast to what is good.
....
--
The unworthy deacon,
Stephen Methodius Hayes
Contact: http://www.geocities.com/Athens/7734/stevesig.htm
Orthodox mission pages: http://www.orthodoxy.faithweb.com/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 1932 Iran & Russia
- From: Jani
- Re: 1932 Iran & Russia
- References:
- 1932 Iran & Russia
- From: lsenders
- Re: 1932 Iran & Russia
- From: lsenders
- 1932 Iran & Russia
- Prev by Date: Re: 1932 Iran & Russia
- Next by Date: Re: 1932 Iran & Russia
- Previous by thread: Re: 1932 Iran & Russia
- Next by thread: Re: 1932 Iran & Russia
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|