Re: PHONY CHRISTIANS
- From: unknown@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 03:19:30 GMT
Matthew Johnson <matthew_member@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>In article <J2bhf.3454$Qs2.1564@trnddc03>, unknown@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
>>
>[snip]
>>Just like I said. Everything about Christmas is a lie.
>No, it is your denunciations of Christmas that are founded on a pack of lies.
OK. Here is my first lie. Psa 89:19 Then thou spakest in vision to thy holy
one, and saidst, I have laid help upon one that is mighty; I have exalted ONE
CHOSEN out of the people. Psa 89:27 Also I will make him my FIRSTBORN, The
trail between verse 19 and 27 can be easily followed, This is speaking about
Jesus. There can only be, one firstborn. The Jews of the time said. if he be
Christ, the CHOSEN of God. Luke 23:35. This renders the whole birth scenario
as moot. The problem is, no one knew who God was going to choose, until he was
chosen. Jesus could not be called as, above nature, or supernatural, until he
was chosen. He was just one of the people. Only after he was born again was he
above nature. Every year, you people drag Jesus back into the flesh. You deny
the birth in the spirit, and honor the flesh. You make Jesus, Baal Jesus. If
you teach about a Jesus that was not prophesied of. You teach about a false
Jesus. Jesus said, I came to fulfill the law.
OK now my second lie. Jesus was not born of the spirit from Mary. He had to be
born again, just like all those who will rule in the second heaven. This was
explained in 1 John 4:2 Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is
come in the flesh is of God: The doctrine of Jesus being born of the spirit
from Mary, is the doctrine of Antichrist. VINES Dict. Anti = a stand in or
vicar. Therefore, The vicar of Christ. One of the titles of the pope.
OK. Now for the third lie. Mat 1:18 Now the birth of Jesus Christ was on this
wise: When as his mother Mary was espoused to Joseph, Espousal was counted the
same as marriage. Therefore any one who impregnated Mary, after, she was
betrothed, was an adulterer. Deu 22:23,24. Without Mary's knowledge,
constitutes rape. This is clearly blasphemy against the Holy Spirit. This
addition to the Bible by the catholic tares, is a clear slander against God,
The Holy Spirit, Jesus, and his carnal family. Heb 2:7 Thou madest him a
little lower than the angels; Man is flesh. Angels are spirits. Therefore. The
carnal Jesus of the flesh was born again of the spirit, after he was chosen,
and rose above the angels. Of course the heathen catholic's say, God can do
anything he wants to. God does not commit adultery, God does not lie. Satan
and the son of Satan lie and blame the lie on God.
These are only three reasons I don't follow the heathen christmas practice. Or
as you say, MY LIES. There are many more, but these should be sufficient for a
person that claims to have wisdom. Of course these would not be enough for the
WE hypocrites. It is not my duty to make you understand or convince anyone. My
duty is to inform. This way, when the wrath of God comes to them. They will
know why. And in the judgement they will be convicted of knowingly slandering
God, blasphemy of the Holy Spirit, and lie's about Jesus. Generally overall,
breaking the commandment by bearing false witness.
>This should be _crystal_ clear after reading St. Leo the Great's _brilliant_
>homily on the Nativity, which you can find in passable English translation at:
>http://www.ccel.org/fathers2/NPNF2-12/Npnf2-12-182.htm#TopOfPage
I see you are familiar with ccel. For a while, if anyone wanted to read the
first fathers series, they would link them the catholic web site. But the
catholics were caught editing these works. So now they are hosted on ccel. The
catholics believe that if one of these so called fathers believed something,
it was Okay to follow that belief. However, if they didn't believe it, they
would edit it in, and as if by magic, they believed it.
A catholic saint must be dead for a certain amount of time, before he is made
a saint. As far as St. Leo goes. I believe Dan 7:18 But the saints of the
most High shall take the kingdom, and possess the kingdom for ever, I accept
this verse as a promise from God. There will not be one dead catholic saint
in the bunch. You probably know that the works of a saint can not be published
until they are edited. And then, only, if the works conform the false
doctrines of the catholic church. Jesus said, Mat 10:24 The disciple is not
above his master, Nor can he be. Therefore, The naming of a person as a saint,
can not be ascribed to by an inferior person. Only a saint can raise another
person to the height of sainthood. The pope being inferior to a saint, can not
raise a disciple above himself. He can only raise him up to equal, to his
position. Needless to say, I don't have any respect for catholic saints.
THE FIRST WITNESS
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: PHONY CHRISTIANS
- From: Matthew Johnson
- Re: PHONY CHRISTIANS
- References:
- PHONY CHRISTIANS
- From: unknown
- Re: PHONY CHRISTIANS
- From: zach
- Re: PHONY CHRISTIANS
- From: unknown
- Re: PHONY CHRISTIANS
- From: Matthew Johnson
- PHONY CHRISTIANS
- Prev by Date: brain research, theology, and freedom
- Next by Date: Was "Re: A problem for old-earth creationists"
- Previous by thread: Re: PHONY CHRISTIANS
- Next by thread: Re: PHONY CHRISTIANS
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
