soc.religion.christian

• Date Index

---

• Re: (!) An Effective Response to Terrorism, bimms
• Re: JESUS IS NO MUSLIM, The Cynic
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: JESUS IS NO MUSLIM, The Cynic
• Re: no it is not, Matthew Johnson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: no it is not, kleinecke
• Few Find It, Frank
• Killing yourself will send you to hell?, bludengutz
  • Re: Killing yourself will send you to hell?, Mike
• (~) Impractical, Immoral, Ninure Saunders
• The Serbian Orthodox Church and Kosovo, Steve Hayes
• (!) The healing life of Taize's Brother Roger, Ninure Saunders
• Overflow from inside, Jacob
• Faith, destiny
• Here is a slightly modified cosmological proof of God's existence, bimms
• (~) Faithfulness, Ninure Saunders
• You Must Have Faith, Frank
• A prophetic challenge and promise, Tracy Hall
  • Re: A prophetic challenge and promise, Proshome
  • Re: A prophetic challenge and promise, lsenders
• Most Popular Articles (of 15,000+), Rowland Croucher
• Satan's Truth: The Jesus Christ Code. ©, caesarjbsquitti
• The Ephesus syndrome, Jacob
• (~) Happy Are They, Ninure Saunders
• (~) A Future of Peace, Ninure Saunders
• (~) Bible Readings for Sunday August 28, Ninure Saunders
• In Luke 13 Jesus casts demon out of woman he considers to be saved., Tim Campbell
• Polygamy in NT churches, Rowland Croucher
• (!) Is Anti-Zionism Anti-Semitic?, Ninure Saunders
• Capital punishment, Gary
  • Re: Capital punishment, Chris Smith
  • Re: Capital punishment, Proshome
• Luke 13 woman, freed of demon, was included in the covenant of God's saving grace., Tim Campbell
• Re: ErrancyWiki is up, kleinecke
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: ErrancyWiki is up, davewheeler1
  • Re: ErrancyWiki is up, bimms
  • Re: ErrancyWiki is up, mnhcc
• ESCAPE NOW: jailbreak from the "culture of consumption.", bimms
  • Re: ESCAPE NOW: jailbreak from the "culture of consumption.", davewheeler1
  • Re: ESCAPE NOW: jailbreak from the "culture of consumption.", Proshome
• Salvation, healer
  • Re: Salvation, B.G. Kent
    • Re: Salvation, Matthew Johnson
    • Re: Salvation, healer
  • Re: Salvation, Proshome
  • Re: Salvation, davewheeler1
    • Re: Salvation, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: Salvation, lsenders
  • Re: Salvation, lsenders
  • Re: Salvation, davewheeler1
• (~) The Chosen Vessel, Ninure Saunders
• Snags: Even Paul thought he'd be better off dead!, jjsargent
  • Re: Snags: Even Paul thought he'd be better off dead!, Jordan
    • Re: Snags: Even Paul thought he'd be better off dead!, Proshome
  • Re: Snags: Even Paul thought he'd be better off dead!, lsenders
  • Re: Snags: Even Paul thought he'd be better off dead!, Betty Jo
  • Re: Snags: Even Paul thought he'd be better off dead!, Proshome
• Mainline Protestants Fail in Defense of Human Rights, Gary
• (~) Bible Readings for Sunday August 21, Ninure Saunders
• See my chistian web page, Gaetan Mailloux
• The Nature of God, Rodney
  • Re: The Nature of God, bimms
• Remembering God's mercies, Jacob
• Why it is godly to CHOOSE to go to Hell, qquito
  • Re: Why it is godly to CHOOSE to go to Hell, bimms
  • Re: Why it is godly to CHOOSE to go to Hell, jordan . parmer
  • Re: Why it is godly to CHOOSE to go to Hell, davewheeler1
  • Re: Why it is godly to CHOOSE to go to Hell, bimms
  • Re: Why it is godly to CHOOSE to go to Hell, Jordan
  • Re: Why it is godly to CHOOSE to go to Hell, Peggy Tatyana
  • Re: Why it is godly to CHOOSE to go to Hell, zach
• Find new friends :), Robert Zawodny
• Original Bible documents, shegeek72
  • Re: Original Bible documents, Jonathan King
  • Re: Original Bible documents, orpheus_j@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Original Bible documents, rtdavide
  • Re: Original Bible documents, kleinecke
  • Re: Original Bible documents, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: Original Bible documents, Brushwork
  • Re: Original Bible documents, roger_pearse
• No Other Hope, Frank
• Is Your God Too Small?, destiny
• Translation Help.....Aramaic/syriac, danieldryhurst
• Re: (~) God's Outreaching Love, Jonathan Bartlett
• 8/15 - Day of Fasting for North Korea, lldeja
  • Re: 8/15 - Day of Fasting for North Korea, davewheeler1
  • Re: 8/15 - Day of Fasting for North Korea, lldeja
• Was "Re: JUDAS", James
  • Re: Was "Re: JUDAS", Proshome
• Re: no title given, zach
• Why the Tree of Knowledge in the first place?, davewheeler1
  • Re: Why the Tree of Knowledge in the first place?, DuhMuze
  • Re: Why the Tree of Knowledge in the first place?, B.G. Kent
  • Re: Why the Tree of Knowledge in the first place?, lsenders
    • Re: Why the Tree of Knowledge in the first place?, B.G. Kent
  • Re: Why the Tree of Knowledge in the first place?, Tracy Hall
  • Re: Why the Tree of Knowledge in the first place?, davewheeler1
  • Re: Why the Tree of Knowledge in the first place?, Barnacle Bill
  • Re: Why the Tree of Knowledge in the first place?, garysibio
• (~) The Book of Love, Ninure Saunders
• The Jesus Christ Code !, Caesarjbsquitti
• CORRECTION: "RELIGION IS FOR THE WEAK, INSECURE, AND UNEDUCATED", Jonathan Bartlett
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: CORRECTION: "RELIGION IS FOR THE WEAK, INSECURE, AND UNEDUCATED", zach
• Wherefore the mythology of demons?, davewheeler1
  • Re: Wherefore the mythology of demons?, lldeja
  • Re: Wherefore the mythology of demons?, davewheeler1
    • Re: Wherefore the mythology of demons?, Steve Hayes
  • Re: Wherefore the mythology of demons?, Jonathan Bartlett
  • Re: Wherefore the mythology of demons?, DuhMuze
  • Re: Wherefore the mythology of demons?, lsenders
  • Re: Wherefore the mythology of demons?, johnnyb
• CALVINISM IS EVIL, Frankie Lee
  • Re: CALVINISM IS EVIL, lsenders
• (~) Bible Readings for Sunday August 14, Ninure Saunders
• Re: MISCONCEPTION: "RELIGION IS FOR THE WEAK, INSECURE, AND UNEDUCATED", Matthew Johnson
• Is the BIBLE wrong ???, nswamfm
  • Re: Is the BIBLE wrong ???, Quasin
    • Re: Is the BIBLE wrong ???, B.G. Kent
  • Re: Is the BIBLE wrong ???, Rodney
  • Re: Is the BIBLE wrong ???, Rodney
• Billy the Fireman, Rowland Croucher
• Free Will: Not An Argument for Evils, qquito
  • Re: Free Will: Not An Argument for Evils, rtdavide
• Atheism does not have missions to feed the hungry., Atheist Plunder
  • Re: Atheism does not have missions to feed the hungry., qquito
    • Re: Atheism does not have missions to feed the hungry., B.G. Kent
  • Re: Atheism does not have missions to feed the hungry., B.G. Kent
  • Re: Atheism does not have missions to feed the hungry., pooua
    • Re: Atheism does not have missions to feed the hungry., Emma Pease
  • Re: Atheism does not have missions to feed the hungry., davewheeler1
  • Re: Atheism does not have missions to feed the hungry., Brushwork
  • Re: Atheism does not have missions to feed the hungry., aklann@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Atheism does not have missions to feed the hungry., pooua
  • Re: Atheism does not have missions to feed the hungry., pooua
  • Re: Atheism does not have missions to feed the hungry., Andrew Springman
  • Re: Atheism does not have missions to feed the hungry., bobcrowley
• Faith vs. optimism?, Jacob
  • Re: Faith vs. optimism?, neutrino
  • Re: Faith vs. optimism?, Jacob
  • Re: Faith vs. optimism?, Barnacle Bill
  • Re: Faith vs. optimism?, Jacob
    • Re: Faith vs. optimism?, Barnacle Bill
  • Re: Faith vs. optimism?, Jonathan Bartlett
  • Re: Faith vs. optimism?, lsenders
  • Re: Faith vs. optimism?, lsenders
  • Re: Faith vs. optimism?, William Lenz
  • Re: Faith vs. optimism?, lsenders
  • Re: Faith vs. optimism?, lsenders
  • Re: Faith vs. optimism?, Jacob
• You may be a fundy atheist if...., Atheist Plunder
  • Re: You may be a fundy atheist if...., davewheeler1
    • Re: You may be a fundy atheist if...., Jonathan Bartlett
  • Re: You may be a fundy atheist if...., Juuitchan
  • Re: You may be a fundy atheist if...., davewheeler1
  • Re: You may be a fundy atheist if...., davewheeler1
  • Re: You may be a fundy atheist if...., aklann@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: You may be a fundy atheist if...., aklann@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: You may be a fundy atheist if...., Andrew Springman
• Aramaic NT text, Proshome
  • Re: Aramaic NT text, lsenders
• Prophets, destiny
  • Re: Prophets, B.G. Kent
  • Re: Prophets, destiny
    • Re: Prophets, B.G. Kent
    • Prophets, Stephen Hayes
• Christian Rationalism - Free eBooks, CR
• MISCONCEPTION: "BIBLICAL MIRACLES ARE MYTH", Atheist Plunder
  • Re: MISCONCEPTION: "BIBLICAL MIRACLES ARE MYTH", davewheeler1
  • Re: MISCONCEPTION: "BIBLICAL MIRACLES ARE MYTH", shegeek72
• Because He Is God, Frank
  • Re: Because He Is God, B.G. Kent
• MISCONCEPTION: "THE SUPERNATURAL DOES NOT EXIST", Atheist Plunder
• The Psychology of Atheism: Psychoanalytic Motives, Atheist Plunder
  • Re: The Psychology of Atheism: Psychoanalytic Motives, B.G. Kent
• WWW.GODSTUDY.COM, Catholic for Sure
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • WWW.GODSTUDY.COM, Catholic for Sure
• Family associations in the next life (survey), Peggy Tatyana
  • Re: Family associations in the next life (survey), Paul
    • Re: Family associations in the next life (survey), Peggy Tatyana
      • Re: Family associations in the next life (survey), Paul
  • Re: Family associations in the next life (survey), Barnacle Bill
  • Re: Family associations in the next life (survey), Tracy Hall
    • Re: Family associations in the next life (survey), B.G. Kent
  • Re: Family associations in the next life (survey), zach
  • Re: Family associations in the next life (survey), Daniel S. Vieira
  • Re: Family associations in the next life (survey), aklann@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Family associations in the next life (survey), B.G. Kent
  • Re: Family associations in the next life (survey), Andrew Springman
  • Re: Family associations in the next life (survey), aklann@xxxxxxxxx
• "Calvin and Calvinism", lsenders
  • Re: "Calvin and Calvinism", Matthew Johnson
    • Re: "Calvin and Calvinism", Joseph T. Adams
      • Re: "Calvin and Calvinism", Matthew Johnson
  • Re: "Calvin and Calvinism", lsenders
  • Re: "Calvin and Calvinism", lsenders
    • Re: "Calvin and Calvinism", Matthew Johnson
  • Re: "Calvin and Calvinism", lsenders
    • Re: "Calvin and Calvinism", Joseph T. Adams
    • Re: "Calvin and Calvinism", Matthew Johnson
  • Re: "Calvin and Calvinism", lsenders
    • Re: "Calvin and Calvinism", Matthew Johnson
  • Re: "Calvin and Calvinism", Andrew Springman
  • Re: "Calvin and Calvinism", lsenders
  • Re: "Calvin and Calvinism", healer
  • Re: "Calvin and Calvinism", healer
• The way to the truth.., caesarjbsquitti
• sermon download, Lawrence Lee
  • Re: sermon download, bludengutz
• (~) Never Too Late, Ninure Saunders
• Please help me!, Frankie Lee
  • Re: Please help me!, B.G. Kent
  • Re: Please help me!, Joseph T. Adams
    • Re: Please help me!, William Lenz
      • Re: Please help me!, Joseph T. Adams
      • Democracy, Steve Hayes
  • Re: Please help me!, zach
  • Re: Please help me!, pooua
  • Re: Please help me!, pooua
  • Re: Please help me!, Gary
    • Re: Please help me!, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: Please help me!, qquito
    • Re: Please help me!, B.G. Kent
      • Re: Please help me!, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: Please help me!, Gary
  • Re: Please help me!, zach
  • Re: Please help me!, pooua
  • Re: Please help me!, Bill Lenz
  • Re: Please help me!, Colin Chee
    • Re: Please help me!, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: Please help me!, Gary
  • Re: Please help me!, Colin Chee
    • Balkan churches and politics, Stephen Hayes
• THE CHRISTIANS, Frankie Lee
• (~) Bible Readings for Sunday August 7, Ninure Saunders
• The Gregorian calendar, Juuitchan
  • Re: The Gregorian calendar, Quasin
    • The Gregorian calendar, Stephen Hayes
  • Re: The Gregorian calendar, Quasin
    • Re: The Gregorian calendar, Helmut Richter
  • Re: The Gregorian calendar, Juuitchan
    • Re: The Gregorian calendar, Quasin
  • Re: The Gregorian calendar, Juuitchan
    • Re: The Gregorian calendar, Helmut Richter
  • Re: The Gregorian calendar, Juuitchan
• Scared of the Holy Spirit?, Jacob
• Re: Transsexual Theology, lldeja
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Transsexual Theology, Matthew Johnson
    • Re: Transsexual Theology, Rowland Croucher
      • Re: Transsexual Theology, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: Transsexual Theology, shegeek72
    • Re: Transsexual Theology, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: Transsexual Theology, lldeja
    • Re: Transsexual Theology, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: Transsexual Theology, lldeja
• JESUS' PASSION, Frankie Lee
  • Re: JESUS' PASSION, dwacon
    • Re: JESUS' PASSION, Joseph T. Adams
  • Re: JESUS' PASSION, Proshome
• What Eternal Life Is, Frank
• The so-called christian fundamentals, fred
  • Re: The so-called christian fundamentals, Steve Hayes
    • Re: The so-called christian fundamentals, Joseph T. Adams
      • Re: The so-called christian fundamentals, Chris Smith
      • Re: The so-called christian fundamentals, Steve Hayes
  • Re: The so-called christian fundamentals, Joseph T. Adams
    • Re: The so-called christian fundamentals, B.G. Kent
      • Re: The so-called christian fundamentals, Joseph T. Adams
      • Re: The so-called christian fundamentals, Proshome
      • Re: The so-called christian fundamentals, Matthew Johnson
      • Re: The so-called christian fundamentals, Joseph T. Adams
      • Re: The so-called christian fundamentals, Proshome
      • Re: The so-called christian fundamentals, Joseph T. Adams
    • Re: The so-called christian fundamentals, B.G. Kent
      • Re: The so-called christian fundamentals, Matthew Johnson
      • Re: The so-called christian fundamentals, Joseph T. Adams
      • Re: The so-called christian fundamentals, Matthew Johnson
    • Re: The so-called christian fundamentals, Proshome
    • Re: The so-called christian fundamentals, B.G. Kent
    • Re: The so-called christian fundamentals, B.G. Kent
  • Re: The so-called christian fundamentals, pooua
  • Re: The so-called christian fundamentals, Proshome
  • Re: The so-called christian fundamentals, lsenders
    • Re: The so-called christian fundamentals, Chris Smith
    • Re: The so-called christian fundamentals, Steve Hayes
  • Re: The so-called christian fundamentals, lsenders
    • Re: The so-called christian fundamentals, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: The so-called christian fundamentals, Brushwork
  • Re: The so-called christian fundamentals, pooua
  • Re: The so-called christian fundamentals, lsenders
  • Re: The so-called christian fundamentals, zach
  • Re: The so-called christian fundamentals, lsenders
  • Re: The so-called christian fundamentals, lsenders
    • Re: The so-called christian fundamentals, Matthew Johnson
    • Re: The so-called christian fundamentals, Steve Hayes
    • Re: The so-called christian fundamentals, hedrick
      • The so-called christian fundamentals, Stephen Hayes
      • Re: The so-called christian fundamentals, lsenders
      • Re: The so-called christian fundamentals, Paul
  • Re: The so-called christian fundamentals, lsenders
  • Re: The so-called christian fundamentals, lsenders
• As many Christians are non-thinkers they will not see it coming, mm2terra
  • Re: As many Christians are non-thinkers they will not see it coming, Jonathan Bartlett
  • Re: As many Christians are non-thinkers they will not see it coming, rickbyerly
  • Re: As many Christians are non-thinkers they will not see it coming, shegeek72
    • Re: As many Christians are non-thinkers they will not see it coming, Matthew Johnson
    • Re: As many Christians are non-thinkers they will not see it coming, Jonathan Bartlett
  • Re: As many Christians are non-thinkers they will not see it coming, dnatree
  • Re: As many Christians are non-thinkers they will not see it coming, mm2terra
    • Re: As many Christians are non-thinkers they will not see it coming, Jonathan Bartlett
    • Re: As many Christians are non-thinkers they will not see it coming, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: As many Christians are non-thinkers they will not see it coming, Andrew Springman
  • Re: As many Christians are non-thinkers they will not see it coming, pooua
• (~) Pulse of Existence, Ninure Saunders
• (~) More Than Enough, Ninure Saunders
• Re: How is "ETERNAL" damnation a form of MERCY?, James
• Re: God the Criminal 1, B.G. Kent
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: God the Criminal 1, bimms
• Believes In God, Frank
• (~) Bible Readings for Sunday July 31, Ninure Saunders
• sinning and littering, rsgreenNOSPPAM
  • Re: sinning and littering, Steve Hayes
  • Re: sinning and littering, lsenders
  • Re: sinning and littering, Jonathan Bartlett
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: sinning and littering, James
• Terrence's Prayer, Innominatus
• Pierced Messiah, Frank
• 1 John 4:8 "God is Love", lsenders
  • Re: 1 John 4:8 "God is Love", Matthew Johnson
• Faith vs. obedience?, Jacob
  • Re: Faith vs. obedience?, Barnacle Bill
• Jesus Is Alive, Frank
• JUDAS, Grant Imrie
  • Re: JUDAS, Betty Jo
• (~) Only Then..., Ninure Saunders
• Believes In The Son, Frank
• Re: Trivia Question for a christian, James
• (~) My Shepherd Walks Near, Ninure Saunders
• God the Criminal, Bahtman
  • Re: God the Criminal, peter . gibbs
    • Re: God the Criminal, B.G. Kent
  • Re: God the Criminal, B.G. Kent
  • Re: God the Criminal, rtdavide
  • Re: God the Criminal, davewheeler1
  • Re: God the Criminal, bimms
  • Re: God the Criminal, lldeja
  • Re: God the Criminal, shegeek72
    • Re: God the Criminal, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: God the Criminal, peter . gibbs
    • Re: God the Criminal, B.G. Kent
  • Re: God the Criminal, zach
  • Re: God the Criminal, davewheeler1
    • Re: God the Criminal, Matthew Johnson
• Eternal Life Is Jesus, Frank
• Fr Alexander Men, the Jews, the Intelligentsia and the Ruaain Orthodox Church, Steve Hayes
  • Re: Fr Alexander Men, the Jews, the Intelligentsia and the Ruaain Orthodox Church, bobcrowley
  • Re: Fr Alexander Men, the Jews, the Intelligentsia and the Ruaain Orthodox Church, Matthew Johnson
    • Re: Fr Alexander Men, the Jews, the Intelligentsia and the Russian Orthodox Church, Steve Hayes
      • Re: Fr Alexander Men, the Jews, the Intelligentsia and the Russian Orthodox Church, Matthew Johnson
      • Fr Alexander Men, the Jews, the Intelligentsia and the Russian Orth, Stephen Hayes
• (~) From HumbleBeginnings, Ninure Saunders
• Snags: The Methodist sellout, Jeffrey J. Sargent
  • Re: Snags: The Methodist sellout, AJA
  • Re: Snags: The Methodist sellout, zach
  • Re: Snags: The Methodist sellout, orpheus_j@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Snags: The Methodist sellout, stephen
• End Times Extension, bobcrowley
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: End Times Extension, James
• (~) Bible Readings for Sunday July 24, Ninure Saunders
• Looking for an original verison of "Hell House", bvallely@xxxxxxx
• Re: CHRISTIANS!, bdratzsch
• The One And Only Is Truth, Frank
• The excuses we make, Jacob
• Peter, Paul, and God, Proshome
  • Re: Peter, Paul, and God, bimms
    • Re: Peter, Paul, and God, Proshome
  • Re: Peter, Paul, and God, fred
  • Re: Peter, Paul, and God, davewheeler1
  • Re: Peter, Paul, and God, pooua
  • Re: Peter, Paul, and God, Mike
• Messiah, Lamb of God., S D Rodrian
• Young people are expected to keep themselves pure, Vinod
• G8 and the Ten Kings of Bible prophecy, www_insider_org
  • Re: G8 and the Ten Kings of Bible prophecy, bdratzsch
• Can prayer be retroactive?, Juuitchan
  • Re: Can prayer be retroactive?, kleinecke
  • Re: Can prayer be retroactive?, bimms
    • Re: Can prayer be retroactive?, Quasin
  • Re: Can prayer be retroactive?, Quasin
  • Re: Can prayer be retroactive?, qquito
    • Re: Can prayer be retroactive?, Quasin
    • Re: Can prayer be retroactive?, B.G. Kent
  • Re: Can prayer be retroactive?, fred
• (~) Killing with words, Ninure Saunders
• Time in Purgatory, Juuitchan
  • Re: Time in Purgatory, Chris Smith
  • Re: Time in Purgatory, bobcrowley
  • Re: Time in Purgatory, kleinecke
  • Re: Time in Purgatory, Barnacle Bill
  • Re: Time in Purgatory, Kevin Blow
  • Re: Time in Purgatory, fred
  • Re: Time in Purgatory, lsenders
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Time in Purgatory, James
    • Re: Time in Purgatory, bimms
      • Re: Time in Purgatory, Barnacle Bill
    • Re: Time in Purgatory, lsenders
• Snags: No food in the Father's house, Jeffrey J. Sargent
  • Re: Snags: No food in the Father's house, stephen
  • Re: Snags: No food in the Father's house, zach
    • Re: Snags: No food in the Father's house, Paul
  • Re: Snags: No food in the Father's house, jjsargent
  • Re: Snags: No food in the Father's house, stephen
  • Re: Snags: No food in the Father's house, zach
  • Re: Snags: No food in the Father's house, Ima Biblicist
  • Re: Snags: No food in the Father's house, jjsargent
  • Re: Snags: No food in the Father's house, bimms
• (~) Lighting Your Corner, Ninure Saunders
• Proof that you can be saved even after you enter Hell, bimms
  • Re: Proof that you can be saved even after you enter Hell, Betty Jo
  • Re: Proof that you can be saved even after you enter Hell, bimms
    • Re: Proof that you can be saved even after you enter Hell, Betty Jo
  • Re: Proof that you can be saved even after you enter Hell, lsenders
    • Re: Proof that you can be saved even after you enter Hell, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: Proof that you can be saved even after you enter Hell, lsenders
  • Re: Proof that you can be saved even after you enter Hell, bimms
    • Re: Proof that you can be saved even after you enter Hell, Paul
  • Re: Proof that you can be saved even after you enter Hell, lsenders
    • Re: Proof that you can be saved even after you enter Hell, Paul
  • Re: Proof that you can be saved even after you enter Hell, bimms
  • Re: Proof that you can be saved even after you enter Hell, lsenders
• What was the true reason for Jesus' death & resurrection?, Kyo Kusanagi
  • Re: What was the true reason for Jesus' death & resurrection?, Betty Jo
  • Re: What was the true reason for Jesus' death & resurrection?, bimms
• The smallest stones covered by the interpretations are the weightiest, dnatree
• lldeja's questions about "spirits" in the Vodou religion, Racine125
• non durant, Marc
  • Re: non durant, lsenders
    • Re: non durant, Quasin
  • Re: non durant, bobcrowley
  • Re: non durant, Brushwork
    • Re: non durant, AJA
      • Re: non durant, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: non durant, Brushwork
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: non durant, hedrick
• (~) Bible Readings for Sunday July 17, Ninure Saunders
• (!) Fear Not, Ninure Saunders
  • Re: (!) Fear Not, dwacon
• Time Well Spent!, rickbyerly
  • Re: Time Well Spent!, davewheeler1
  • Re: Time Well Spent!, rickbyerly
  • Re: Time Well Spent!, davewheeler1
  • Re: Time Well Spent!, Brushwork
  • Re: Time Well Spent!, rickbyerly
• A site about the crucifixion darkness wen Jesus die., Gaetan Mailloux
  • Re: A site about the crucifixion darkness wen Jesus die., Brushwork
  • A site about the crucifixion darkness wen Jesus die., Stephen Hayes
• Please pray for us we are in Hurricane Dennis path.., 257roberts
• Join the Debate!!, quddusaliquddus
• Jesus The Messiah, Frank
• catholic church near Kajaani/FINLAND, zuko
• The new testament way of life, Jacob
• Faith and Skepticism, Betty Jo
  • Re: Faith and Skepticism, davewheeler1
    • Re: Faith and Skepticism, Betty Jo
    • Re: Faith and Skepticism, Betty Jo
  • Re: Faith and Skepticism, bimms
  • Re: Faith and Skepticism, Brushwork
  • Re: Faith and Skepticism, davewheeler1
  • Re: Faith and Skepticism, Brushwork
  • Re: Faith and Skepticism, Brushwork
  • Re: Faith and Skepticism, Mike
  • Re: Faith and Skepticism, Brushwork
    • Re: Faith and Skepticism, Betty Jo
    • Re: Faith and Skepticism, Betty Jo
  • Re: Faith and Skepticism, bimms
  • Re: Faith and Skepticism, bimms
  • Re: Faith and Skepticism, Brushwork
    • Re: Faith and Skepticism, Betty Jo
  • Re: Faith and Skepticism, Brushwork
  • Re: Faith and Skepticism, bimms
    • Re: Faith and Skepticism, B.G. Kent
  • Re: Faith and Skepticism, davewheeler1
    • Re: Faith and Skepticism, Betty Jo
  • Re: Faith and Skepticism, Brushwork
    • Re: Faith and Skepticism, Betty Jo
    • Re: Faith and Skepticism, Betty Jo
  • Re: Faith and Skepticism, Brushwork
  • Re: Faith and Skepticism, bimms
  • Re: Faith and Skepticism, jjsargent
    • Re: Faith and Skepticism, AJA
    • Re: Faith and Skepticism, Betty Jo
    • Re: Faith and Skepticism, Betty Jo
  • Re: Faith and Skepticism, Brushwork
  • Re: Faith and Skepticism, jjsargent
    • Re: Faith and Skepticism, entropy
  • Re: Faith and Skepticism, Brushwork
  • Re: Faith and Skepticism, lsenders
  • Re: Faith and Skepticism, lsenders
• Music in Worship, Rowland Croucher
  • Re: Music in Worship, jjsargent
  • Re: Music in Worship, peter . gibbs
• Altered states of conciousness vs. sorcery, witchcraft, etc., lldeja
  • Re: Altered states of conciousness vs. sorcery, witchcraft, etc., B.G. Kent
  • Re: Altered states of conciousness vs. sorcery, witchcraft, etc., Mike
    • Altered states of conciousness vs. sorcery, witchcraft, etc., Stephen Hayes
    • Re: Altered states of conciousness vs. sorcery, witchcraft, etc., Mike
  • Re: Altered states of conciousness vs. sorcery, witchcraft, etc., lsenders
  • Re: Altered states of conciousness vs. sorcery, witchcraft, etc., lsenders
  • Re: Altered states of conciousness vs. sorcery, witchcraft, etc., lldeja
  • Re: Altered states of conciousness vs. sorcery, witchcraft, etc., lldeja
  • Re: Altered states of conciousness vs. sorcery, witchcraft, etc., Mike
  • Re: Altered states of conciousness vs. sorcery, witchcraft, etc., lldeja
  • Re: Altered states of conciousness vs. sorcery, witchcraft, etc., Mike
    • Re: Altered states of conciousness vs., Quasin
  • Re: Altered states of conciousness vs. sorcery, witchcraft, etc., lldeja
  • Re: Altered states of conciousness vs. sorcery, witchcraft, etc., Mike
  • Re: Altered states of conciousness vs., lldeja
• About the 'End Times"..., stellaM
  • Re: About the 'End Times"..., B.G. Kent
  • Re: About the 'End Times"..., lsenders
• oops...I actually did want responses, jjsargent
  • Re: oops...I actually did want responses, bimms
  • Re: oops...I actually did want responses, davewheeler1
  • Re: oops...I actually did want responses, bobcrowley
  • Re: oops...I actually did want responses, stellaM
    • Re: oops...I actually did want responses, William Lenz
  • Re: oops...I actually did want responses, William Lenz
  • Re: oops...I actually did want responses, stephen
    • Re: oops...I actually did want responses, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: oops...I actually did want responses, jjsargent
  • Re: oops...I actually did want responses, bobcrowley
• How God feels about psychics, mediums, fortune-tellers..., stellaM
  • Re: How God feels about psychics, mediums, fortune-tellers..., B.G. Kent
    • Re: How God feels about psychics, mediums, fortune-tellers..., stellaM
    • Re: How God feels about psychics, mediums, fortune-tellers..., B.G. Kent
  • Re: How God feels about psychics, mediums, fortune-tellers..., seeker
    • Re: How God feels about psychics, mediums, fortune-tellers..., stellaM
    • Re: How God feels about psychics, mediums, fortune-tellers..., Quasin
    • Re: How God feels about psychics, mediums, fortune-tellers..., B.G. Kent
    • Re: How God feels about psychics, mediums, fortune-tellers..., B.G. Kent
  • Re: How God feels about psychics, mediums, fortune-tellers..., Racine125
  • Re: How God feels about psychics, mediums, fortune-tellers..., lsenders
• Angels and Demons--Know the difference, stellaM
• Your Eternity, Frank
  • Re: Your Eternity, Proshome
    • Re: Your Eternity, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: Your Eternity, Tracy Hall
• Saul and God--Witch of Endor, stellaM
  • Re: Saul and God--Witch of Endor, B.G. Kent
    • Re: Saul and God--Witch of Endor, stellaM
    • Re: Saul and God--Witch of Endor, B.G. Kent
  • Re: Saul and God--Witch of Endor, Proshome
    • Re: Saul and God--Witch of Endor, stellaM
      • Re: Saul and God--Witch of Endor, Proshome
    • Re: Saul and God--Witch of Endor, B.G. Kent
  • Re: Saul and God--Witch of Endor, Racine125
    • Re: Saul and God--Witch of Endor, Proshome
• No "Conundrum" About Adam, stellaM
  • Re: No "Conundrum" About Adam, davewheeler1
    • Re: No, stellaM
    • Re: No, B.G. Kent
  • Re: No "Conundrum" About Adam, Proshome
    • Re: No, stellaM
      • Re: No, Proshome
      • Re: No, Matthew Johnson
    • Re: No, B.G. Kent
      • Re: No, Proshome
  • Re: No, davewheeler1
    • Re: No, Proshome
  • Re: No, aklann@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Bible and Vodou - Saul and the Witch of Endor, stellaM
  • Re: The Bible and Vodou - Saul and the Witch of Endor, B.G. Kent
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The Bible and Vodou - Saul and the Witch of Endor, Racine125
    • Re: The Bible and Vodou - Saul and the Witch of Endor, Jani
  • Re: The Bible and Vodou - Saul and the Witch of Endor, lldeja
    • Re: The Bible and Vodou - Saul and the Witch of Endor, Quasin
  • Re: The Bible and Vodou - Saul and the Witch of Endor, Racine125
    • Re: The Bible and Vodou - Saul and the Witch of Endor, Jani
  • Re: The Bible and Vodou - Saul and the Witch of Endor, peter . gibbs
    • Re: The Bible and Vodou - Saul and the Witch of Endor, Jani
    • Re: The Bible and Vodou - Saul and the Witch of Endor, AJA
  • Re: The Bible and Vodou - Saul and the Witch of Endor, ritterdl69
  • Re: The Bible and Vodou - Saul and the Witch of Endor, lldeja
• (~) Spiritual Peaks and Valleys, Ninure Saunders
• Re: Co-inherence (was Re: Deep down we all know God exists.), ethelthrogmorton
  • Re: Co-inherence (was Re: Deep down we all know God exists.), Matthew Johnson
• Is there an 'accurately translated' Bible? No, the premise is false, mm2terra
  • Re: Is there an 'accurately translated' Bible? No, the premise is fa, stellaM
  • Re: Is there an 'accurately translated' Bible? No, the premise is false, Mike
  • Re: Is there an 'accurately translated' Bible? No, the premise is false, shegeek72
  • Re: Is there an 'accurately translated' Bible? No, the premise is false, bimms
    • Re: Is there an 'accurately translated' Bible? No, the premise is false, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: Is there an 'accurately translated' Bible? No, the premise is false, ethelthrogmorton
  • Re: Is there an 'accurately translated' Bible? No, the premise is false, rtdavide
  • Re: Is there an 'accurately translated' Bible? No, the premise is false, davewheeler1
    • Re: Is there an 'accurately translated' Bible? No, the premise is false, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: Is there an 'accurately translated' Bible? No, the premise is false, bimms
  • Re: Is there an 'accurately translated' Bible? No, the premise is false, Mike
    • Re: Is there an 'accurately translated' Bible? No, the premise is false, AJA
  • Re: Is there an 'accurately translated' Bible? No, the premise is false, bimms
  • Re: Is there an 'accurately translated' Bible? No, the premise is false, bimms
    • Re: Is there an 'accurately translated' Bible? No, the premise is false, Helmut Richter
    • Re: Is there an 'accurately translated' Bible? No, the premise is false, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: Is there an 'accurately translated' Bible? No, the premise is false, davewheeler1
    • Re: Is there an 'accurately translated' Bible? No, the premise is false, Helmut Richter
      • Re: Is there an 'accurately translated' Bible? No, the premise is false, Matthew Johnson
    • Re: Is there an 'accurately translated' Bible? No, the premise is false, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: Is there an 'accurately translated' Bible? No, the premise is false, davewheeler1
  • Re: Is there an 'accurately translated' Bible? No, the premise is false, bimms
    • Re: Is there an 'accurately translated' Bible? No, the premise is false, Helmut Richter
      • Re: Is there an 'accurately translated' Bible? No, the premise is false, Rich Wales
  • Re: Is there an 'accurately translated' Bible? No, the premise is false, Mike
  • Re: Is there an 'accurately translated' Bible? No, the premise is false, davewheeler1
    • Re: Is there an 'accurately translated' Bible? No, the premise is, Quasin
      • Re: Is there an 'accurately translated' Bible? No, the premise is, Proshome
  • Re: Is there an 'accurately translated' Bible? No, the premise is false, peter . gibbs
  • Re: Is there an 'accurately translated' Bible? No, the premise is, davewheeler1
  • Re: Is there an 'accurately translated' Bible? No, the premise is false, davewheeler1
    • Re: Is there an 'accurately translated' Bible? No, the premise is false, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: Is there an 'accurately translated' Bible? No, the premise is false, davewheeler1
  • Re: Is there an 'accurately translated' Bible? No, the premise is false, bimms
  • Re: Is there an 'accurately translated' Bible? No, the premise is false, davewheeler1
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Is there an 'accurately translated' Bible? No, the premise is false, James
• Is there a deliberately non-Pauline sect of Christianity?, Phoenix8172
  • Re: Is there a deliberately non-Pauline sect of Christianity?, Mike
  • Re: Is there a deliberately non-Pauline sect of Christianity?, B.G. Kent
  • Re: Is there a deliberately non-Pauline sect of Christianity?, Proshome
  • Re: Is there a deliberately non-Pauline sect of Christianity?, Yogensha
  • Re: Is there a deliberately non-Pauline sect of Christianity?, bobcrowley
  • Re: Is there a deliberately non-Pauline sect of Christianity?, Barnacle Bill
  • Re: Is there a deliberately non-Pauline sect of Christianity?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
    • Re: Is there a deliberately non-Pauline sect of Christianity?, Steve Hayes
• Hi I'm Annie...am new to the group..., annie
  • Re: Hi I'm Annie...am new to the group..., stellaM
  • Re: Hi I'm Annie...am new to the group..., Frank
  • Re: Hi I'm Annie...am new to the group..., stellaM
    • Re: Hi I'm Annie...am new to the group..., B.G. Kent
  • Re: Hi I'm Annie...am new to the group..., Bruce
• (~) Bible Readings for Sunday July 10, Ninure Saunders
• The Adam Conundrum, davewheeler1
  • Re: The Adam Conundrum, ahgilmour
  • Re: The Adam Conundrum, bimms
  • Re: The Adam Conundrum, Rodney Dunning
  • Re: The Adam Conundrum, William Lenz
    • Re: The Adam Conundrum, stellaM
      • Re: The Adam Conundrum, William Lenz
  • Re: The Adam Conundrum, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: The Adam Conundrum, Steve Hayes
  • Re: The Adam Conundrum, davewheeler1
  • Re: The Adam Conundrum, davewheeler1
    • Re: The Adam Conundrum, Steve Hayes
  • Re: The Adam Conundrum, davewheeler1
    • Re: The Adam Conundrum, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: The Adam Conundrum, davewheeler1
  • Re: The Adam Conundrum, bimms
  • Re: The Adam Conundrum, davewheeler1
    • Re: The Adam Conundrum, Matthew Johnson
    • The Adam Conundrum, Stephen Hayes
  • Re: The Adam Conundrum, davewheeler1
  • Re: The Adam Conundrum, davewheeler1
    • Re: The Adam Conundrum, Matthew Johnson
    • Re: The Adam Conundrum, Steve Hayes
  • Re: The Adam Conundrum, bimms
  • Re: The Adam Conundrum, dnatree
    • Re: The Adam Conundrum, Ima Biblicist
  • Re: The Adam Conundrum, davewheeler1
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The Adam Conundrum, James
    • Re: The Adam Conundrum, davewheeler1
    • Re: The Adam Conundrum, lsenders
    • Re: Re: The Adam Conundrum, God_dependent
    • Re: The Adam Conundrum, rtdavide
• Re: Was Jesus a Christian?, Yogensha
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Was Jesus a Christian?, jjsargent
    • Re: Was Jesus a Christian?, B.G. Kent
    • Re: Was Jesus a Christian?, Rowland Croucher
  • Re: Was Jesus a Christian?, jjsargent
• Religious marketing and depth (?) of faith, Jeffrey J. Sargent
• Sam Shepard recognizes Christianity's exhaustion, Jeffrey J. Sargent
  • Re: Sam Shepard recognizes Christianity's exhaustion, bimms
  • Re: Sam Shepard recognizes Christianity's exhaustion, jjsargent
  • Re: Sam Shepard recognizes Christianity's exhaustion, bimms
  • Re: Sam Shepard recognizes Christianity's exhaustion, jjsargent
    • Re: Sam Shepard recognizes Christianity's exhaustion, Joseph T. Adams
• What's the URL of your favorite Chat Group?, Jason
• He Who Believes, Frank
• Leave pain and struggle, and so I go away, dnatree
• Interesting new take on Ecclesiastes, Jeffrey J. Sargent
• Re: Eternal Damnation? Very weak Scriptural support!!!!!, Paul
• Re: (!) The Supreme Court got it right on religion, bimms
  • Re: (!) The Supreme Court got it right on religion, Chris Smith
  • Re: (!) The Supreme Court got it right on religion, Emma Pease
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: (!) The Supreme Court got it right on religion, Rodney Dunning
    • Re: (!) The Supreme Court got it right on religion, Paul
      • Re: (!) The Supreme Court got it right on religion, Matthew Johnson
• Blessed forgiveness, Jacob
• Poor-quality God -- and dishonest evangelism, Jeffrey J. Sargent
  • Re: Poor-quality God -- and dishonest evangelism, qquito
  • Re: Poor-quality God -- and dishonest evangelism, rickbyerly
  • Re: Poor-quality God -- and dishonest evangelism, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: Poor-quality God -- and dishonest evangelism, bobcrowley
  • Re: Poor-quality God -- and dishonest evangelism, entropy
  • Re: Poor-quality God -- and dishonest evangelism, jjsargent
  • Re: Poor-quality God -- and dishonest evangelism, stellaM
    • Re: Poor-quality God -- and dishonest evangelism, B.G. Kent
  • Re: Poor-quality God -- and dishonest evangelism, jjsargent
    • Re: Poor-quality God -- and dishonest evangelism, Matthew Johnson
    • Re: Poor-quality God -- and dishonest evangelism, AJA
  • Re: Poor-quality God -- and dishonest evangelism, stephen
• "Born again" not unique to Christianity, Jeffrey J. Sargent
  • Re: "Born again" not unique to Christianity, lsenders
    • Re: "Born again" not unique to Christianity, Yogensha
  • Re: "Born again" not unique to Christianity, rickbyerly
    • Re: "Born again" not unique to Christianity, Yogensha
  • Re: "Born again" not unique to Christianity, pooua
  • Re: "Born again" not unique to Christianity, pooua
    • Re: "Born again" not unique to Christianity, Yogensha
  • Re: "Born again" not unique to Christianity, lsenders
    • Re: "Born again" not unique to Christianity, Yogensha
      • Re: "Born again" not unique to Christianity, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: "Born again" not unique to Christianity, jjsargent
  • Re: "Born again" not unique to Christianity, lsenders
  • Re: "Born again" not unique to Christianity, jjsargent
  • Re: "Born again" not unique to Christianity, jjsargent
    • Re: "Born again" not unique to Christianity, AJA
      • Re: "Born again" not unique to Christianity, Matthew Johnson
      • Re: "Born again" not unique to Christianity, AJA
  • Re: "Born again" not unique to Christianity, lsenders
    • Re: "Born again" not unique to Christianity, B.G. Kent
    • Re: "Born again" not unique to Christianity, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: "Born again" not unique to Christianity, jjsargent
  • Re: "Born again" not unique to Christianity, lsenders
  • Re: "Born again" not unique to Christianity, lsenders
  • Re: "Born again" not unique to Christianity, lsenders
    • Re: "Born again" not unique to Christianity, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: "Born again" not unique to Christianity, lsenders
    • Re: "Born again" not unique to Christianity, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: "Born again" not unique to Christianity, rickbyerly
• What are they doing right that you aren't?, Jeffrey J. Sargent
  • Re: What are they doing right that you aren't?, bobcrowley
• A meeting place for Christians, David
• Re: Jesus wasn't a Republican...so why all the conservative Republican, Jonathan Bartlett
• The Rainbow of Sin. ©, caesarjbsquitti
• How to refer to transvestites or transsexuals or hermaphrodites, lldeja
  • Re: How to refer to transvestites or transsexuals or hermaphrodites, Mike
    • Re: How to refer to transvestites or transsexuals or hermaphrodites, B.G. Kent
      • Re: How to refer to transvestites or transsexuals or hermaphrodites, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: How to refer to transvestites or transsexuals or hermaphrodites, shegeek72
  • Re: How to refer to transvestites or transsexuals or hermaphrodites, ethelthrogmorton
  • Re: How to refer to transvestites or transsexuals or hermaphrodites, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: How to refer to transvestites or transsexuals or hermaphrodites, shegeek72
    • Re: How to refer to transvestites or transsexuals or hermaphrodites, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: How to refer to transvestites or transsexuals or hermaphrodites, lldeja
  • Re: How to refer to transvestites or transsexuals or hermaphrodites, shegeek72
  • Re: How to refer to transvestites or transsexuals or hermaphrodites, Mike
  • Re: How to refer to transvestites or transsexuals or hermaphrodites, Proshome
    • Re: How to refer to transvestites or transsexuals or hermaphrodites, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: How to refer to transvestites or transsexuals or hermaphrodites, shegeek72
    • Re: How to refer to transvestites or transsexuals or hermaphrodites, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: How to refer to transvestites or transsexuals or hermaphrodites, shegeek72
    • Re: How to refer to transvestites or transsexuals or hermaphrodites, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: How to refer to transvestites or transsexuals or hermaphrodites, shegeek72
  • Re: How to refer to transvestites or transsexuals or hermaphrodites, lldeja
  • Re: How to refer to transvestites or transsexuals or hermaphrodites, lldeja
  • Re: How to refer to transvestites or transsexuals or hermaphrodites, ethelthrogmorton
    • Re: How to refer to transvestites or transsexuals or hermaphrodites, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: How to refer to transvestites or transsexuals or hermaphrodites, shegeek72
    • Re: How to refer to transvestites or transsexuals or hermaphrodites, Matthew Johnson
    • Re: How to refer to transvestites or transsexuals or hermaphrodites, Rowland Croucher
  • Re: How to refer to transvestites or transsexuals or hermaphrodites, shegeek72
    • Re: How to refer to transvestites or transsexuals or hermaphrodites, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: How to refer to transvestites or transsexuals or hermaphrodites, shegeek72
    • Re: How to refer to transvestites or transsexuals or hermaphrodites, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: How to refer to transvestites or transsexuals or hermaphrodites, shegeek72
  • Re: How to refer to transvestites or transsexuals or hermaphrodites, shegeek72
    • How to refer to transvestites or transsexuals or hermaphrodites, Stephen Hayes
    • Re: How to refer to transvestites or transsexuals or hermaphrodites, shegeek72
      • Re: How to refer to transvestites or transsexuals or hermaphrodites, Chris Smith
      • How to refer to transvestites or transsexuals or hermaphrodites, Stephen Hayes
      • Re: How to refer to transvestites or transsexuals or hermaphrodites, shegeek72
      • Re: How to refer to transvestites or transsexuals or hermaphrodites, Matthew Johnson
    • Re: How to refer to transvestites or transsexuals or hermaphrodites, Juuitchan
      • Re: How to refer to transvestites or transsexuals or hermaphrodites, B.G. Kent
  • Re: How to refer to transvestites or transsexuals or hermaphrodites, Juuitchan
  • Re: How to refer to transvestites or transsexuals or hermaphrodites, shegeek72
• (~) Rescued!, Ninure Saunders
• Re: lesbian relationships, Tom Kelly
• Re: Religion and the media, Jani
  • Re: Religion and the media, Steve Hayes
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Religion and the media, ethelthrogmorton
    • Re: Religion and the media, Steve Hayes
• Re: THE TAIPANUS BRIEF, bobcrowley
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: THE TAIPANUS BRIEF, bobcrowley
  • Re: THE TAIPANUS BRIEF, bobcrowley
  • Re: THE TAIPANUS BRIEF, bobcrowley
• Homosexual Marriage: Two Christian Views, Rowland Croucher
  • Re: Homosexual Marriage: Two Christian Views, ethelthrogmorton
    • Re: Homosexual Marriage: Two Christian Views, Matthew Johnson
    • Re: Homosexual Marriage: Two Christian Views, Steve Hayes
    • Re: Homosexual Marriage: Two Christian Views, Ima Biblicist
      • Homosexual Marriage: Two Christian Views, Stephen Hayes
      • Re: Homosexual Marriage: Two Christian Views, Ima Biblicist
      • Re: Homosexual Marriage: Two Christian Views, Steve Hayes
  • Re: Homosexual Marriage: Two Christian Views, Timothy J. Warren
    • Re: Homosexual Marriage: Two Christian Views, Matthew Johnson
    • Re: Homosexual Marriage: Two Christian Views, Ninure Saunders
  • Re: Homosexual Marriage: Two Christian Views, ethelthrogmorton
  • Re: Homosexual Marriage: Two Christian Views, rickbyerly
    • Re: Homosexual Marriage: Two Christian Views, Matthew Johnson
    • Re: Homosexual Marriage: Two Christian Views, B.G. Kent
  • Re: Homosexual Marriage: Two Christian Views, rickbyerly
    • Re: Homosexual Marriage: Two Christian Views, B.G. Kent
      • Re: Homosexual Marriage: Two Christian Views, Proshome
    • Re: Homosexual Marriage: Two Christian Views, B.G. Kent
  • Re: Homosexual Marriage: Two Christian Views, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: Homosexual Marriage: Two Christian Views, ethelthrogmorton
    • Re: Homosexual Marriage: Two Christian Views, Matthew Johnson
    • Re: Homosexual Marriage: Two Christian Views, Steve Hayes
  • Re: Homosexual Marriage: Two Christian Views, Racine125
  • Re: Homosexual Marriage: Two Christian Views, ethelthrogmorton
    • Homosexual Marriage: Two Christian Views, Stephen Hayes
    • Injustice, Stephen Hayes
• Debt Cancellation and Poor Countries, Rowland Croucher
  • Re: Debt Cancellation and Poor Countries, Rowland Croucher
• Testing ourselves, Jacob
  • Re: Testing ourselves, davewheeler1
    • Re: Testing ourselves, Matthew Johnson
• ;-) Bible Riddles, Ninure Saunders
• Re: Answer me this, Anthony Williams
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Answer me this, lsenders
    • Re: Answer me this, Dave
    • Re: Answer me this, Jonathan Bartlett
    • Re: Answer me this, Anthony Williams
      • Re: Answer me this, Ima Biblicist
      • Re: Answer me this, Proshome
  • Re: Answer me this, Rodney Dunning
    • Re: Answer me this, Anthony Williams
• The marriage alliance, Steve Hayes
  • Re: The marriage alliance, B.G. Kent
  • Re: The marriage alliance, shegeek72
    • Re: The marriage alliance, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: The marriage alliance, Ninure Saunders
  • Re: The marriage alliance, ethelthrogmorton
    • Re: The marriage alliance, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: The marriage alliance, orpheus_j@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: The marriage alliance, zach
    • Re: The marriage alliance, B.G. Kent
  • Re: The marriage alliance, shegeek72
    • Re: The marriage alliance, Matthew Johnson
    • Re: The marriage alliance, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: The marriage alliance, orpheus_j@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: The marriage alliance, shegeek72
• Re: Is drinking alcohol sinful in Christianity?, Dave Ranney
  • Re: Is drinking alcohol sinful in Christianity?, Proshome
    • Re: Is drinking alcohol sinful in Christianity?, Dave Ranney
      • Re: Is drinking alcohol sinful in Christianity?, Proshome
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Is drinking alcohol sinful in Christianity?, Daniel L. Snyder
• Re: Help! Jews Needing Evangelism, lsenders
  • Re: Help! Jews Needing Evangelism, Emma Pease
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Help! Jews Needing Evangelism, Emma Pease
  • Re: Help! Jews Needing Evangelism, bobcrowley
  • Re: Help! Jews Needing Evangelism, Yogensha
    • Re: Help! Jews Needing Evangelism, mmount
• Re: (~) Will that be an acceptable excuse?, lsenders
  • Re: (~) Will that be an acceptable excuse?, Matthew Johnson
• Re: Is "competition" compatible with Christianity ? (e.g. in Sport & in Business), ship
  • Re: Is "competition" compatible with Christianity ? (e.g. in Sport & in Business), Steve Hayes
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Is "competition" compatible with Christianity ? (e.g. in Sport & in Business), William Lenz
    • Re: Is "competition" compatible with Christianity ? (e.g. in Sport & in Business), ship
      • Re: Is "competition" compatible with Christianity ? (e.g. in Sport & in Business), William Lenz
      • Re: Is "competition" compatible with Christianity ? (e.g. in Sport & in Business), ship
      • Re: Is "competition" compatible with Christianity ? (e.g. in Sport & in Business), William Lenz
      • Is "competition" compatible with Christianity ? (e.g. in Sport & i, Stephen Hayes
      • Re: Is "competition" compatible with Christianity ? (e.g. in Sport & i, Rowland Croucher
    • Re: Is "competition" compatible with Christianity ? (e.g. in Sport & in Business), ship
      • Re: Is "competition" compatible with Christianity ? (e.g. in Sport & in Business), William Lenz
    • Re: Is "competition" compatible with Christianity ? (e.g. in Sport & in Business), Mike
      • Re: Is "competition" compatible with Christianity ? (e.g. in Sport & in Business), ship
      • Re: Is "competition" compatible with Christianity ? (e.g. in Sport & in Business), William Lenz
      • Re: Is "competition" compatible with Christianity ? (e.g. in Sport & in Business), William Lenz
      • Re: Is "competition" compatible with Christianity ? (e.g. in Sport & in Business), Mike
    • Re: Is "competition" compatible with Christianity ? (e.g. in Sport & in Business), Mike
      • Re: Is "competition" compatible with Christianity ? (e.g. in Sport & in Business), William Lenz
    • Re: Is "competition" compatible with Christianity ? (e.g. in Sport & in Business), Mike
      • Re: Is "competition" compatible with Christianity ? (e.g. in Sport & in Business), William Lenz
  • Re: Is "competition" compatible with Christianity ? (e.g. in Sport & in Business), Paul
    • Re: Is "competition" compatible with Christianity ? (e.g. in Sport & in Business), ship
• Re: Deep down we all know God exists., Matthew Johnson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Deep down we all know God exists., shegeek72
    • Re: Deep down we all know God exists., Matthew Johnson
  • Re: Deep down we all know God exists., shegeek72
    • Re: Deep down we all know God exists., Matthew Johnson
  • Re: Deep down we all know God exists., shegeek72
    • Re: Deep down we all know God exists., Matthew Johnson
  • Re: Deep down we all know God exists., ethelthrogmorton
    • Re: Deep down we all know God exists., Matthew Johnson
  • Re: Deep down we all know God exists., ethelthrogmorton
    • Re: Deep down we all know God exists., Matthew Johnson
    • Re: Deep down we all know God exists., AJA
      • Re: Deep down we all know God exists., Matthew Johnson
      • Co-inherence (was Re: Deep down we all know God exists.), AJA
      • Re: Co-inherence (was Re: Deep down we all know God exists.), Matthew Johnson
      • Re: Co-inherence (was Re: Deep down we all know God exists.), AJA
      • Re: Co-inherence (was Re: Deep down we all know God exists.), Matthew Johnson
      • Re: Co-inherence (was Re: Deep down we all know God exists.), AJA
    • Re: Deep down we all know God exists., B.G. Kent
      • Re: Deep down we all know God exists., Matthew Johnson
  • Re: Deep down we all know God exists., ethelthrogmorton
    • Re: Deep down we all know God exists., Matthew Johnson
  • Re: Deep down we all know God exists., shegeek72
  • Re: Deep down we all know God exists., shegeek72
    • Re: Deep down we all know God exists., Matthew Johnson
  • Re: Deep down we all know God exists., shegeek72
  • Re: Deep down we all know God exists., ethelthrogmorton
  • Re: Deep down we all know God exists., ethelthrogmorton
  • Re: Deep down we all know God exists., shegeek72
  • Re: Deep down we all know God exists., shegeek72
    • Re: Deep down we all know God exists., Matthew Johnson
  • Re: Deep down we all know God exists., shegeek72
    • Re: Deep down we all know God exists., Matthew Johnson
• Aids to Casting Out Demons, Jim
  • Re: Aids to Casting Out Demons, lsenders
  • Re: Aids to Casting Out Demons, Jim
  • Re: Aids to Casting Out Demons, rickbyerly
  • Re: Aids to Casting Out Demons, aklann@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Aids to Casting Out Demons, lsenders
  • Re: Aids to Casting Out Demons, Tim Campbell
  • Re: Aids to Casting Out Demons, bludengutz
  • Re: Aids to Casting Out Demons, lsenders
  • Re: Aids to Casting Out Demons, Tim Campbell
  • Re: Aids to Casting Out Demons, Tim Campbell
  • Re: Aids to Casting Out Demons, lsenders
    • Re: Aids to Casting Out Demons, Quasin
  • Re: Aids to Casting Out Demons, lsenders
    • Re: Aids to Casting Out Demons, Quasin
  • Re: Aids to Casting Out Demons, bdratzsch
  • Re: Aids to Casting Out Demons, bdratzsch
  • Re: Aids to Casting Out Demons, Tim Campbell
  • Re: Aids to Casting Out Demons, lsenders
  • Re: Aids to Casting Out Demons, Jim
  • Re: Aids to Casting Out Demons, bludengutz
  • Re: Aids to Casting Out Demons, lsenders
  • Re: Aids to Casting Out Demons, lsenders
  • Re: Aids to Casting Out Demons, lldeja
  • Re: Aids to Casting Out Demons, lsenders
  • Re: Aids to Casting Out Demons, lsenders
  • Re: Aids to Casting Out Demons, Tim Campbell
  • Re: Aids to Casting Out Demons, bludengutz
• Re: Do we SEEK YHWH's Wisdom ?, b t
  • Re: Do we SEEK YHWH's Wisdom ?, b t
    • Re: Do we SEEK YHWH's Wisdom ?, b t
      • Re: Do we SEEK YHWH's Wisdom ?, b t
      • Re: Do we SEEK YHWH's Wisdom ?, b t
      • Re: Do we SEEK YHWH's Wisdom ?, b t
      • Re: Do we SEEK YHWH's Wisdom ?, b t
      • Re: Do we SEEK YHWH's Wisdom ?, b t
      • Re: Do we SEEK YHWH's Wisdom ?, b t
      • Re: Do we SEEK YHWH's Wisdom ?, b t
      • Re: Do we SEEK YHWH's Wisdom ?, b t
      • Re: Do we SEEK YHWH's Wisdom ?, b t
      • Re: Do we SEEK YHWH's Wisdom ?, B.G. Kent
• Re: Is "competition" compatible with Christianity ? (e.g. in Sport & in Business), bobcrowley
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Is "competition" compatible with Christianity ? (e.g. in Sport & in Business), ship
  • Re: Is "competition" compatible with Christianity ? (e.g. in Sport & in Business), Mike
    • Re: Is "competition" compatible with Christianity ? (e.g. in Sport & in Business), ship
      • Re: Is "competition" compatible with Christianity ? (e.g. in Sport & in Business), Matthew Johnson
    • Re: Is "competition" compatible with Christianity ? (e.g. in Sport & in Business), Mike
    • Re: Is "competition" compatible with Christianity ? (e.g. in Sport & in Business), bobcrowley
  • Re: Is "competition" compatible with Christianity ? (e.g. in Sport & in Business), James
• Re: Snags: The Bible *says* God plays favorites!, Betty Jo
• Re: WATER BAPTISM., Matthew Johnson
• Re: recent christian turned agnostic, Matthew Johnson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: recent christian turned agnostic, Betty Jo
  • Re: recent christian turned agnostic, B.G. Kent
  • Re: recent christian turned agnostic, rickbyerly
  • Re: recent christian turned agnostic, ethelthrogmorton
    • Re: recent christian turned agnostic, Steve Hayes
• Re: Praying by tongue: cult practice???, bludengutz
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Praying by tongue: cult practice???, rickbyerly
  • Re: Praying by tongue: cult practice???, jrussell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Praying by tongue: cult practice???, Proshome
    • Re: Praying by tongue: cult practice???, Paul
  • Re: Praying by tongue: cult practice???, Mike
  • Re: Praying by tongue: cult practice???, bobcrowley
• Re: What was the SINGLE best Jesus prophesy?, Matthew Johnson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What was the SINGLE best Jesus prophesy?, rtdavide
  • Re: What was the SINGLE best Jesus prophesy?, stu
  • Re: What was the SINGLE best Jesus prophesy?, rtdavide
    • Re: What was the SINGLE best Jesus prophesy?, Matthew Johnson
• Re: Pray for the World, Rowland Croucher
  • Re: Pray for the World, Rowland Croucher
    • Re: Pray for the World, Rowland Croucher
      • Re: Pray for the World, Rowland Croucher
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Pray for the World, Rowland Croucher
  • Re: Pray for the World, Rowland Croucher
    • Re: Pray for the World, Rowland Croucher
      • Re: Pray for the World, Rowland Croucher
      • Re: Pray for the World, Rowland Croucher
  • Re: Pray for the World, Rowland Croucher
    • Re: Pray for the World, Rowland Croucher
      • Re: Pray for the World, Rowland Croucher
  • Re: Pray for the World, Rowland Croucher
    • Re: Pray for the World, Rowland Croucher
  • Re: Pray for the World, Rowland Croucher
  • Re: Pray for the World, Rowland Croucher
  • Re: Pray for the World, B.G. Kent
  • Re: Pray for the World, Rowland Croucher
  • Pray for the World, Rowland Croucher
  • Pray for the World, Rowland Croucher
  • Pray for the World, Rowland Croucher
• Re: info please? Catholic Children's home 1970s/ 70s UK schools, gerryhandke
• Re: THE SOON TO COME NUCLEAR WAR IS BEING PREPARED !, Matthew Johnson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: THE SOON TO COME NUCLEAR WAR IS BEING PREPARED !, bobcrowley
    • Re: THE SOON TO COME NUCLEAR WAR IS BEING PREPARED !, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: THE SOON TO COME NUCLEAR WAR IS BEING PREPARED !, lsenders
  • Re: THE SOON TO COME NUCLEAR WAR IS BEING PREPARED !, bobcrowley
    • Re: THE SOON TO COME NUCLEAR WAR IS BEING PREPARED !, B.G. Kent
    • Re: Re: THE SOON TO COME NUCLEAR WAR IS BEING PREPARED !, stellaM
  • Re: THE SOON TO COME NUCLEAR WAR IS BEING PREPARED !, lsenders
    • Re: Re: THE SOON TO COME NUCLEAR WAR IS BEING PREPARED !, stellaM
    • Re: Re: THE SOON TO COME NUCLEAR WAR IS BEING PREPARED !, B.G. Kent
• Re: Jesus as Lord, Proshome
• Re: A personal dissent against Christianity, Proshome
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: A personal dissent against Christianity, Proshome
  • Re: A personal dissent against Christianity, Dave
    • Re: A personal dissent against Christianity, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: A personal dissent against Christianity, B.G. Kent
    • Re: A personal dissent against Christianity, Proshome
  • Re: A personal dissent against Christianity, bimms
• Re: kindness, davewheeler1
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • kindness, morningstar333
    • Re: kindness, seeker
    • Re: kindness, lldeja
• Re: Religion, Dave Dodson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Religion, Betty Jo
    • Re: Religion, B.G. Kent
    • Re: Religion, Betty Jo
  • Re: Religion, rickbyerly
  • Re: Religion, B.G. Kent
  • Re: Religion, Steve Hayes
  • Re: Religion, bobcrowley
  • Re: Religion, zach
    • Re: Religion, B.G. Kent
  • Re: Religion, ethelthrogmorton
    • Re: Religion, Joseph T. Adams
  • Re: Religion, rickbyerly
  • Re: Religion, ethelthrogmorton
    • Re: Religion, Joseph T. Adams
  • Re: Religion, Brushwork
  • Re: Religion, James
    • Re: Religion, Betty Jo
      • Re: Religion, Joseph T. Adams
• Re: Are you in the True Church of Christ?, lsenders
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Are you in the True Church of Christ?, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: Are you in the True Church of Christ?, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: Are you in the True Church of Christ?, ethelthrogmorton
    • Re: Are you in the True Church of Christ?, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: Are you in the True Church of Christ?, ethelthrogmorton
    • Re: Are you in the True Church of Christ?, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: Are you in the True Church of Christ?, jrussell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Are you in the True Church of Christ?, B.G. Kent
      • Re: Are you in the True Church of Christ?, Joseph T. Adams
    • Re: Are you in the True Church of Christ?, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: Are you in the True Church of Christ?, ethelthrogmorton
    • Re: Are you in the True Church of Christ?, Matthew Johnson
    • Re: Are you in the True Church of Christ?, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: Are you in the True Church of Christ?, ethelthrogmorton
• (~) GOOD GRIEF... BAD GRIEF, Ninure Saunders
• Re: Just who is immoral in the evolution debate?, bludengutz
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Just who is immoral in the evolution debate?, lsenders
  • Re: Just who is immoral in the evolution debate?, lsenders
  • Re: Just who is immoral in the evolution debate?, zach
  • Re: Just who is immoral in the evolution debate?, bludengutz
    • Re: Just who is immoral in the evolution debate?, teardrops369NOSPAM
      • Re: Just who is immoral in the evolution debate?, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: Just who is immoral in the evolution debate?, teardrops369NOSPAM
    • Re: Just who is immoral in the evolution debate?, Chris Smith
    • Re: Just who is immoral in the evolution debate?, Jonathan Bartlett
      • Re: Just who is immoral in the evolution debate?, teardrops369NOSPAM
  • Re: Just who is immoral in the evolution debate?, teardrops369NOSPAM
  • Re: Just who is immoral in the evolution debate?, lsenders

• Security
• UNIX
• Linux
• Coding
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint

newsgroups.derkeiler.com  > Archive  > Soc  > soc.religion.christian  > 2005-08