Re: No ambiguity
- From: "Kent Johnson" <kent@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 07:35:00 CST
Continuous, to you, then, Susan, means it is re-created every thousand years
or so?
--Kent
"Susan Maneck" <smaneck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:690c00970606180936j7cf212c9ua39c352e4e778d3f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I understand that you believe it is a reference to Progressive Revelation
and that this revelation is not to be considered relative until the next
revelation comes along. But I do not see that in the text.
Dear Kent,
It is right here:
"Divine Revelation is a continuous and progressive process"
warmest, Susan
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: No ambiguity
- From: smaneck
- Re: No ambiguity
- From: Douglas McAdam
- Re: No ambiguity
- References:
- No ambiguity
- From: Kent Johnson
- Re: No ambiguity
- From: Kent Johnson
- Re: No ambiguity
- From: Bill Pike
- Re: No ambiguity
- From: Kent Johnson
- Re: No ambiguity
- From: diamondsouled
- Re: No ambiguity
- From: Kent Johnson
- Re: No ambiguity
- From: diamondsouled
- Re: No ambiguity
- From: Kent Johnson
- Re: No ambiguity
- From: Susan Maneck
- No ambiguity
- Prev by Date: Re: As a deepent Baha'i I would say . . . .
- Next by Date: Re: Our Interfaith Group
- Previous by thread: Re: No ambiguity
- Next by thread: Re: No ambiguity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|