Re: No ambiguity
- From: Bill Pike <willi4470@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 13:12:16 CST
On Wed, 7 Jun 2006 12:07:37 CST, "Kent Johnson" <kent@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Hi Bill. Let's recap. I said that Baha'u'llah wrote in his Most Holy Book
that Baha'is could have two wives, and Abdu'l-Baha "interpreted" that to
mean Baha'is could have only one wife. I said that situation sound silly to
non-Baha'is, and you answered this:
"No more so than the current Christian discussion as to whether HisWhat part of Conferred Infallibility are you having problems with,
Holiness Jesus Christ was ever married. Marriage was a requirement
for observant Jews of the time and even more so for rabbis."
sounds to me like your opinion is that the explanations of 'Abdul Baha
are not infallible even though His Holiness Baha'u'llah said they are
so. So it appears from here that since a Baha'i has already accepted
what His Holiness Baha'u'llah has said as the absolute truth in-toto
you are saying that His Holiness Baha'u'llah was a liar and therefore
a false prophet. Or you are saying that the conferred infallibility
regarding the authority of 'Abdul Baha is false, which is IMO is
breaking the covenant with His Holiness Baha'u'llah.
Care to enumerate?
Pax Terra
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: No ambiguity
- From: Kent Johnson
- Re: No ambiguity
- References:
- No ambiguity
- From: Kent Johnson
- Re: No ambiguity
- From: Bill Pike
- Re: No ambiguity
- From: Kent Johnson
- Re: No ambiguity
- From: Bill Pike
- Re: No ambiguity
- From: Kent Johnson
- No ambiguity
- Prev by Date: Re: Ideas about Politics
- Next by Date: Re: No ambiguity
- Previous by thread: Re: No ambiguity
- Next by thread: Re: No ambiguity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|