Re: Renaming the Law
- From: smaneck@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 12:51:37 CST
> What is confusing here is that St. Paul never openly states that
> Christians need to follow Christian *law*. He always avoids using the
> term 'Christian law' even though it is clearly implied. I guess I was
> wondering why that was.
Dear Matt,
I don't think Paul thought there was a seperate "Christian law" apart
from the Torah. He believed the function of the law was to drive us to
despair of pleasing God by our own efforts so that we receive Christ
and His grace. He would not have understood Baha'u'llah's statement,
"Obey My Law for love of My Beauty."
warmest, Susan
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Renaming the Law
- From: Matt Menge
- Re: Renaming the Law
- References:
- Renaming the Law
- From: Matt Menge
- Re: Renaming the Law
- From: Matt Menge
- Renaming the Law
- Prev by Date: Re: Baha'is need a new strategy
- Next by Date: Re: Chemistry from a Baha'i perspective
- Previous by thread: Re: Renaming the Law
- Next by thread: Re: Renaming the Law
- Index(es):