Re: 'Abdu'l-Bahá and evolution
- From: "Daniel Grolin" <d_grolin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 20:39:03 CST
Dear Mavaddat,
Kalimat Press (2001) has published a book on this subject called "Evolution
and Baha'i Beliefs" edited by Keven Brown.
Thomas Linard has written a commentary on Brown's paper on 'Abdu'l-Baha and
evelution published in Baha'i Studies Review 12 (the most recent).
Regards,
Daniel
"Mavaddat" <mavaddatastic@xxxxxxxxxxx> skrev i en meddelelse
news:1125174435.394430.140230@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> As I was doing some research on the Bahá'í position on evolution, I
> stumbled upon this statement by 'Abdu'l-Bahá in "The Promulgation of
> Universal Peace", p.359, which I find greatly disturbing, if my
> understanding of it is correct:
>
> "The lost link of Darwinian theory is itself a proof that man is not an
> animal. How is it possible to have all the links present and that
> important link absent? Its absence is an indication that man has never
> been an animal. It will never be found."
>
> Firstly, since there is still much discovery to be made in the way of
> paleoanthropology, this line of reasoning seems to present an argument
> from ignorance, which is a logical fallacy. (Especially in this case,
> absence of evidence is not evidence of absence)
>
> Secondly, the denial of a "lost link" seems to be entirely superfluous
> to 'Abdu'l-Bahá's previous reasoning, in which he admits that the
> human essence has been manifest in all of the physical forms of man:
>
> "Throughout this progression there has been a transference of type, a
> conservation of species or kind. Realizing this we may acknowledge the
> fact that at one time man was an inmate of the sea, at another period
> an invertebrate, then a vertebrate and finally a human being standing
> erect." (ibid., 358)
>
> So why say that there will never be a "lost link" found? If it were
> found, it would present no threat to 'Abdu'l-Bahá's formulation of
> evolution, since the human essence is not observable (and therefore not
> subject to denial) by scientists.
>
> Does anyone have or know of a scientifically compatible way to consider
> this statement of 'Abdu'l-Bahá?
>
>
.
- References:
- 'Abdu'l-Bahá and evolution
- From: Mavaddat
- 'Abdu'l-Bahá and evolution
- Prev by Date: Re: MORAL RELATIVISM
- Next by Date: Re: Humankind "forgetful of its God"
- Previous by thread: Re: 'Abdu'l-Bahá and evolution
- Next by thread: RE: For the birds
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|