I am wrong about Flight 77 Pentagon. Outstanding video simulation of attack on the Pentagon using Boeing 757
- From: "Dick Eastman" <olfriend@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 18:29:16 -0400
Jon, the simulation has convinced me.
I now believe that a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon -- that this explanation
best fits the data.
Dick Eastman
Here is a very fine simulation of a Boeing 757 crashing into the Pentagon --
not perfect, but enough to convince me I am wrong.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVDdjLQkUV8
showing the lampposts being knocked down on the way in -- smoke coming from
the starboard engine after hitting the third pole -- then taking the viewer
over to the security camera north of the crash and showing the Boeing behind
the yellow pass reader box with the tail fin visible and the smoke trail
following, but also with the nose of the plane sticking out to the right of
the pass reader box which of course we do not see in the video -- then
taking the viewer back to Washington Blvd in front of the crash to see the
plane enter the Pentagon -- a little impossibly since almost the entire
fuselage enters the first floor, leaving the tail fin to take out the pillar
14 on the second floor (the top of the port wing is hits right in the middle
of the first-floor windows, the top of the fuselage not even reaching the
windows of the second floor -- then the viewer is taken a little south to
see the port side of the plane as it approaches the Pentagon -- showing the
plane stricking the generator and the engine hitting the fence and then
matching that up with an actual photo of the damage with the bite taken out
of the generator and the hole in the cyclone fence -- WHICH I FOUND
PERSUASIVE TO THE POINT THAT I AM NO LONGER CONVINCED THAT IT WAS NOT A
BOEING THAT HIT THE PENTAGON-- the most convincing part of the exhibit --
really makes me toss out my once firm conclusions -- even though it did not
refute details of any of my "proofs" (actually it supported many of them:
it confirmed that if a Boeing were behind the pass reader box that the nose
should be visible sticking out to the right of the pass reader box -- it
showed the smoke trail and the tail fin, which is what I have always said
they are -- and it showed that the engine must have hit in vacinity of
pillar #16 -- although they do not attempt to simulate this detail of the
crash, or explain why pillar #16 is still standing -- nor do they explain
what could have caused the damage on the second floor to the right of (south
of) pillar #19 -- nor how the piece of the starboard side of a Boeing 757
was found on the north part of the lawn -- all my little beloved
proofs" -- but I must admit that none of my arguments stands up to what the
simulation proves about the damage to the trailer and the fence. I will
just have to live with the contradictions.
Please pass this around -- I don't want to hold up the search for truth any
more than I already have.
Yes, I know -- several people tried to tell me this before -- Ron Harvey
and many others.
Dick Eastman
Yakima, Washington
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Prev by Date: Mistakes in Iraq parallel those of Vietnam
- Next by Date: Re: I am wrong about Flight 77 Pentagon. Outstanding video simulation of attack on the Pentagon using Boeing 757
- Previous by thread: Mistakes in Iraq parallel those of Vietnam
- Next by thread: Re: I am wrong about Flight 77 Pentagon. Outstanding video simulation of attack on the Pentagon using Boeing 757
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
