Re: Obligations and the taping question
- From: -T- <t@xxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 07:35:01 CST
On Mon, 27 Jun 2005 00:51:24 CST, "JB" <masonicstuff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>"-T-" <t@xxxxx> wrote in message
>news:3q7ub1lpc6fl6tqkk3tgqm6tbsdcshueon@xxxxxxxxxx
>
>>
>> But what if you accidentally took the tapes somewhere and forgot
>> them, or your suitcase was stolen with the tapes in them, or...?
>> You could conceivably then have passed on the secrets "without
>> meaning to".
>> although we all know that truth be told it is all available on the
>> web, in books,... so as long as your intent is good and you are at
>> peace with it...
>>
>
>I do take your point but what if you talked in your sleep? What if
>you accidentally pointed to an entry in the dictionary or bible?
>Truth be told, common sense should be good enough.
I don't necessarily disagree, as I tried to convey at the end of my
comments, but I compare a bit with Jewish rabbinical tradition, where
many prohibitions stem from the need to guard against even the
appearance of impropriety... Obviously not _quite_ the same
thing...just my PoV...
Fraternally,
Tomer
(I've just noticed that the australian ritual does not include the
word "myself"...)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Obligations and the taping question
- From: Alex Fisher
- Re: Obligations and the taping question
- References:
- Re: Obligations and the taping question
- From: -T-
- Re: Obligations and the taping question
- From: KIV11
- Re: Obligations and the taping question
- From: -T-
- Re: Obligations and the taping question
- From: JB
- Re: Obligations and the taping question
- Prev by Date: Re: freemasons stance on religion of members
- Next by Date: Masonry in Iraq?
- Previous by thread: Re: Obligations and the taping question
- Next by thread: Re: Obligations and the taping question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|