Re: Britain has two million single parent families with majority of children raised by mother alone

On Jan 25, 3:49 am, "Society" <Soci...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"retardsman" <remarks...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:2d1256e1-d63a-4f74-b56b-beafd935455c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx







PolishKnight wrote:

Society wrote:

MCP wrote...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2089144/Britain-million-singl...

There are now nearly two million single parent families
in Britain, official figures revealed yesterday.  The vast
majority are headed by a mother, meaning that
millions of children are being raised in households
where there is no father.

Her Majesty's Government is a polygynist to the tune of
two million concubines. Disgusting!

Hard to imagine that a Muslim takeover of Britain would
be an improvement but there you have it...

One of the arguments used by women's firsters on the
discussion about "women and children first" policies
on lifeboats was that they raised children and without
children, there was no future. This was on the
British DailyMail coming from "Chanelle"
from New Orleans.

Then let the call be for "men and children first."  Having
popped their sprogs, the females are expendable but without
children have no future without _men_ to provide for them.

Silly Chanelle, where does she think the money for her
welfare checks comes from.  (Yeah, someone might retort
"but it's all borrowed money, so we don't need men!" but
they forget who built and maintains the country that's doing
the borrowing.  The Chinese aren't mailing the checks
directly to Chanelle because _she's_ such a good credit
risk...)

I responded that it was laughable that single mothers
were raising the future of society based upon the current
performance of their children.

The site has a "like/dislike" feature and while initial
voting had my comment at a negative 10, it ultimately
wound up with a positive 20 BUT it was removed
for being "abusive".

the truth is very Abusive indeed to our gynocracies

Undoubtedly.  Females are soooo easily offended.

not to mention Offensive, which is another word the
Poor Victim Darlings constantly trot out to silence
dissent from der gynogulag

"_die_ Gynogulag" - it's a feminine noun so it takes
the feminine article. Ha ha.


thx for the correction, yr version is ever so much more prophetic


Seriously, though, if Gynogulag were really a word
in German ("gulag" comes from Russian and "gyno" from
Greek) it would probably be a "das" word (no gender)
because words that express a similar idea such as
Gefängnis (jail) and Konzentrationslager (concentration
camp) are "das" words.  (But - shsss - don't tell
the feminazis that.  Let 'em stew.)

Getting back to your earlier point about females
being "offensive",  that explains why there's so much
space at the supermarket (an entire aisle at one store!)
marked "feminine hygiene".  They've got offensive odor,
offensive appearance...  One product, soap, can fix up
men but females require a multitude of products in order
to be presentable in public.

yeah "Offended" -- that was the go-to all-purpose Magic Word of the
Eighties for the femfascists and korrrectoids

anytime i mentioned the truth about anything female, there was always
some woman nearby to inform me haughtily that she FELT OFFENDED by my
comment

this was the Gulag's cue that all discussion and free speech would
thus immediately stop (after all, a member of the First Class felt
negatively impacted, and we cant have that!)

what astonished me most (doesnt anymore tho) was that these monsters
truly DID expect their orders would be met with immediate obedience
and contrition

musta confoozled me w larry summers

dont guess theyre confoozled about that anymore tho :O)

.