Re: Orwellian Nightmare: Science Is Whatever 'the Party' Says It Is
- From: Masculist <masculist@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 11:59:02 -0800 (PST)
On Dec 16, 9:27 am, w...@xxxxxxxxx (the wharf rat) wrote:
In article <A33Wm.30889$Jo5.24...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
MCP <gf010w5...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Last week I was on a university panel formed to debate the issue of science
and religion. My argument was the same one I've been making for years: given
the known laws of physics - in particular, general relativity (Einstein's
theory of gravity) and quantum mechanics - we have no choice but to conclude
that God exists.
Isn't this the same old "We don't know what caused it so it must
have been God" line of...reasoning...?
It's improper logic. Not scientific at all.
How about G-d? Or "Father"? That works!
Tom
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Orwellian Nightmare: Science Is Whatever 'the Party' Says It Is
- Next by Date: Re: Jack Straw says punish women 'in the community'
- Previous by thread: Re: Orwellian Nightmare: Science Is Whatever 'the Party' Says It Is
- Next by thread: Re: Orwellian Nightmare: Science Is Whatever 'the Party' Says It Is
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|