Re: Law is 'unjust' for unwed couples


"MCP" <gf010w5035@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> reported in message
news:GvAri.12737$7c.2002@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6923373.stm

Couples who are living together should have more
legal rights, according to a report from the
Law Commission.

Lemmee guess: This "Law Commission" is a breeding ground
for more billable hours for the Lawyer-Courtroom Industrial
Complex.

There is already a proven system for "couples who are
living together" to easily obtain "more legal rights".
It's called _marriage_. Sheesh. Shakespeare showed
a lot of sense when he had, who was it, Falstaff? utter:
"kill all the lawyers."

It says the current law is "unjust" [...]

Yeah, unjust for men but that never stopped the Matriarchal
Establishment and its servile Front Men, has it?

--
Trick: The preponderance of male legislators
(male columnists, etc.) demonstrates
male power.

False and sexist. This is known as "The Frontman Fallacy":
looking at what _sex_ influential people are instead of
looking at _what they actually do_. Most legislators,
male and female, show favoritism to women's interests.
Female circumcision is committed almost entirely by women,
yet no-one says female circumcision demonstrates female power.

From the post "FAQ: Feminist myths and tricks
frequently used to disrupt discussion".
by Steve Reynolds, stever@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

The entire FAQ can be found at:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=stever.FADC.0079@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

.

Quantcast