Re: Women Hate Equality (part 2).

On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 21:39:28 -0700, "connor_a@xxxxxxxxxxx"
<connor_a@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Jul 31, 1:42 am, John Larkin
<jjlar...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 21:53:16 -0700, Grizzlie Antagonist


I design electronics, good electronics, on a scale that affects the
world. If you are ever cured of cancer, chances are roughly even that
some of my gear was involved in developing the treatment.

If the *** you do means we need a special award for you, how about a
baseball bat up the ass in recognition for your piss and pooh? I mean
c'mon, even within a mere 50 light years WHO has heard of humans?!?

Shessh. And the sun shines out of JL's *** as well.

Yeah, next JL says "I created the fucking sun".

I was pointing out, to GA's direct challenge, that I *do* things
instead of whining about why I can't do things. He said that I make
the world worse because he doesn't like my attitude; I think I make
the world better because of what I *do*, and the hell with attitude.

That's a problem, confusing intention with action. It's fantasy versus
reality.

I wonder if GA does anything to make the world a better place. Hating
women isn't effective one way or the other by itself, because it's
merely an internal state. Whan it comes to action, he refuses to say
one way or another whether he represents female clients with
professional integrity, or sandbags their cases because he hates them.
Too bad he won't answer, because it's the only interesting issue he's
ever evoked.

So, if GA calls me useless, and I suggest that I'm not useless, the
weenies jump on me for being arrogant. Fine with me.

What do you do to make the world a better place?

John

.

Quantcast