Re: Women Hate Equality (part 2).

On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 21:06:20 -0700, retardsman <remarksman@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

On 29 Jul, 17:18, John Larkin
<jjlar...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 15:07:24 -0700, Grizzlie Antagonist





<lloydsofhanf...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 29, 2:04 pm, John Larkin
<jjlar...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 09:22:07 GMT, "MCP" <gf010w5...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

http://whatmenthinkofwomen.blogspot.com/2007/07/women-hate-equality-p...

How often have we seen the likes of the National Organization of Women scream at
anything that may benefit males in any way, shape or form, viciously fighting to
deny anything that may make issues a little fairer...?

Fighting anything from funding for to Making better Fathers to
denying a proper education for boys..

And from any women....
Not one single comment concerning the 70-30 ratio of students at Universities in
women's favour!

See this week's Time magazine for an interesting piece on how the boys
are doing.


here's the piece of femprop to which this pathetic goddess-worshipper
is referring


http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1647452,00.html


Time's a total attempt to whitewash the very real disenfrancisement of
american -- and indeed western -- boys and men

Time knows that the vast majority of its audience are Sleepers
desperately wanting to remain Asleep

vast male impoverishment, unemployment, suicide rates, dropouts,
imprisonment, etc etc but there is No Problem




Bottom line: pretty good.


True Bottom Line: pretty well fucked

especially by the pathetic 'John Larkins' of this world

You're the one complaining about how - sob - tough life is. Nobody's
disenfranchised me because I won't let them.

What a bunch of pansies.

John


.