Re: Women Hate Equality (part 2).

On 29 Jul, 17:18, John Larkin
<jjlar...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 15:07:24 -0700, Grizzlie Antagonist





<lloydsofhanf...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 29, 2:04 pm, John Larkin
<jjlar...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 09:22:07 GMT, "MCP" <gf010w5...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

http://whatmenthinkofwomen.blogspot.com/2007/07/women-hate-equality-p...

How often have we seen the likes of the National Organization of Women scream at
anything that may benefit males in any way, shape or form, viciously fighting to
deny anything that may make issues a little fairer...?

Fighting anything from funding for to Making better Fathers to
denying a proper education for boys..

And from any women....
Not one single comment concerning the 70-30 ratio of students at Universities in
women's favour!

See this week's Time magazine for an interesting piece on how the boys
are doing.


here's the piece of femprop to which this pathetic goddess-worshipper
is referring


http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1647452,00.html


Time's a total attempt to whitewash the very real disenfrancisement of
american -- and indeed western -- boys and men

Time knows that the vast majority of its audience are Sleepers
desperately wanting to remain Asleep

vast male impoverishment, unemployment, suicide rates, dropouts,
imprisonment, etc etc but there is No Problem




Bottom line: pretty good.


True Bottom Line: pretty well fucked

especially by the pathetic 'John Larkins' of this world



Any boy unfortunate to find himself alone in a room with you for any
extended period of time is likely to require intensive counseling
afterwards.

You don't want the boys to be doing well, because you wouldn't have
enough to complain about. Feminists may have invented professional
victimization, but the socmen have embraced it fully.

John-


like the sellout who wrote the Time piece, you're a liar and a punk

here's my favorite bit of femprop from Time's mammyjournalism:

********


A growing congregation of writers have begun to argue that the
trouble with boys is mostly a myth. Sara Mead is one; she was until
recently a senior policy analyst at Education Sector, a Washington
think tank largely funded by the Gates Foundation. Intrigued by the
wave of books and articles about failing boys, Mead crunched some
numbers, focusing narrowly on the question of school performance. The
former Clinton Administration official concluded that "with a few
exceptions, American boys are scoring higher and achieving more than
they ever have before."

******************


LOL!!

oh yeah right, John, that's a real unbiased ah, journalist there --
Sara Mead

former appointee of Hill . . . oops i mean Mr. President Bill
Clinton

Progressive Policy 'analyst'

and let's see, oh my, Dragonmouth Mead is funded by the Lind . . .
sorry, i mefan Bill Gates Foundation, supporters of diverse global
activities designed to empower girls and women

but more pointedly, to disempower boys and men

how strange that an employee of such a supremacist organization,
pretending to journalism, would do 'important research' and come to
the conclusion that, why, by golly, there just ISN'T ANY indication at
all that boys are having any problems in american society

now, if we could all just return to the real issues, our regularly
scheduled channel, we're going to need ten billion dollars more for
our next VAWA implmentation stage. . . .

you, sara, Time, you're all traitors not only to your countries,
you're traitors to fairminded people everywhere

may you and your totalitarian ideologies pass soon



.