Re: Women Hate Equality (part 2).
- From: John Larkin <jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 17:18:12 -0700
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 15:07:24 -0700, Grizzlie Antagonist
<lloydsofhanford@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 29, 2:04 pm, John Larkin
<jjlar...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 09:22:07 GMT, "MCP" <gf010w5...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
http://whatmenthinkofwomen.blogspot.com/2007/07/women-hate-equality-p...
How often have we seen the likes of the National Organization of Women scream at
anything that may benefit males in any way, shape or form, viciously fighting to
deny anything that may make issues a little fairer...?
Fighting anything from funding for to Making better Fathers to
denying a proper education for boys..
And from any women....
Not one single comment concerning the 70-30 ratio of students at Universities in
women's favour!
See this week's Time magazine for an interesting piece on how the boys
are doing. Bottom line: pretty good.
Any boy unfortunate to find himself alone in a room with you for any
extended period of time is likely to require intensive counseling
afterwards.
You don't want the boys to be doing well, because you wouldn't have
enough to complain about. Feminists may have invented professional
victimization, but the socmen have embraced it fully.
John
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Women Hate Equality (part 2).
- From: Grizzlie Antagonist
- Re: Women Hate Equality (part 2).
- From: retardsman
- Re: Women Hate Equality (part 2).
- References:
- Women Hate Equality (part 2).
- From: MCP
- Re: Women Hate Equality (part 2).
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Women Hate Equality (part 2).
- From: Grizzlie Antagonist
- Women Hate Equality (part 2).
- Prev by Date: Re: Women get more jail time for forgetting kids in cars
- Next by Date: Re: Army under fire for 'busty' GI Jane recruitment ads
- Previous by thread: Re: Women Hate Equality (part 2).
- Next by thread: Re: Women Hate Equality (part 2).
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|