Re: Anti-misandry website
- From: wrat@xxxxxxxxx (the wharf rat)
- Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 10:57:12 +0000 (UTC)
In article <1185271028.122025.87790@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Rob <robwilard@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Interesting. Send me the evidence that you have transcended biology
(or any other science for that matter). I propose we divvy up the
Nobel Prize 50/50.
The other day I flew to San Francisco in 4 hours. Since if
God had meant us to fly we would have been born with wings I submit
that this act transcends my non-aeronautic biology.
Oh, and I have a few artifical parts to me, allowing me to
transcend the unfortunate biologic fact that I can't regenerate missing
pieces like a newt.
Hmmm let's see, what else... If I was female I could transcend
certain biological aspects of my fertility.
Would that be three Nobels, or only 2 and a half? See you in
Stockholm!
Right thought, right mind, and right action.
This gets better as you reveal more about it! You've found a way of
telling the future so that you know what is right? Sounds like we'll
Please. There's no need to resort to sarcasm. You could just
admit that you don't understand.
That's a simple-minded translation of certain Buddhist principles.
Right thought doesn't mean "correct" in the sense of 2+2=4 correct, but
rather more like "correct focus", not allowing your willpower to be distracted
and diverted by, well, distractions. (Like Pandydahl. That was not right
thought, so I stopped.) Right mind likewise doesn't mean "correct" as in
"Republicans are correct" or "Plato was right", but rather "correct
state of mind". Right mindfullness might be a better translation. It
refers to the idea that your mind creates your reality, and so should
correctly reflect what you wish to bring about in the world. Right action
requires that a person avoid destructive acts if possible. Destructive
acts in this sense encompass things like stealing and lieing, so this is
an idea also found in Western thought.
Ok?
Could you let me have tomorrow's Lotto numbers, just as a starter?
42.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Anti-misandry website
- From: Rob
- Re: Anti-misandry website
- References:
- Anti-misandry website
- From: ddnoe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Anti-misandry website
- From: Rob
- Re: Anti-misandry website
- From: the wharf rat
- Re: Anti-misandry website
- From: Rob
- Anti-misandry website
- Prev by Date: 'NewSpeak' and the Origins of Polcor Ideology
- Next by Date: Re: Men's Lack of Choice and the Pay Gap
- Previous by thread: Re: Anti-misandry website
- Next by thread: Re: Anti-misandry website
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading