Intellectual bullies or chicken littles?

In article <1182837023.431040.148090@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Andre Lieven <andrelieven@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 22 Jun, 08:23, PolishKnight <mar...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <1182489619.695302.298...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Grizzlie Antagonist <lloydsofhanf...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Jun 21, 7:42 pm, PolishKnight <mar...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <1182231448.391006.186...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Grizzlie Antagonist <lloydsofhanf...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Jun 18, 7:48 pm, d...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Andre Lieven) wrote:
Grizzlie Antagonist (lloydsofhanf...@xxxxxxxxx) writes:
On Jun 17, 8:23 pm, "Society" <Soci...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
"Grizzlie Antagonist" <lloydsofhanf...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message

news:Qq6di.4351$c06.759@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

connor_a wrote...

A male president represents the interests of cunt.
A female president represents the interests of cunt.

I know. In that sense, there isn't any difference between the
two.

But I mean -- to have one of them actually BE the president
would be too much to stand.

I expect everyone who hooted "chickenhawk" and
"draft dodger" at President GW Bush to deny their vote
to hillary clinton, if they are honest.

And did you also expect that those who said that Clinton's lack
of
military service and his private life were none of anyone else's
business would allow GW Bush the same zone of privacy?

Well, I'd be just as uninterested in whether Bush were getting blow
jobs in the White House as I was re Clinton getting same.

That is because you are not an active partisan on the American
political scene.

There is no doubt that Democratic operatives were looking for just
that sort of dirt on GWB and other Republicans. Witness Dan Rather's
immolation on the "military service" issue.

Unless I'm mistaken, I have an imperfect memory of Alan Dershowitz --
who passionately defended Clinton's "zone of privacy" in 1998 --
calling upon Congressional investigators to ransack Clarence Thomas's
garbage for the purpose of determining Thomas's sexual tastes in
1991. This was in the middle of the Anita Hill brouhaha.

Dershowitz himself actually had a regular men's rights column in
Penthouse once upon a time and in 1993 would himself be charged with
sexual harassment for having raised the issue of false rape
allegations in class.

Whether he took precautions with his own garbage is not recorded
anywhere.

Hello you two,

I have a naive NoVa resident who bought into some of the leftist tripe
(before I educated him) about "chickenhawks". He told me that the
left
had an effective strategy: Get people with the right (or more
accurately, correct) background (war veterans) who either could be
controlled or had an anti-war agenda and then argue that anyone who
didn't have a combat war record and advocated war was a "chickenhawk".

Kerry dug out his medals (that he threw over the fence) and came out as
a war hero. It was laughable and amazing that he thought he could get
away with it (he must have thought we had a press as good as Stalin's).

More or less, their strategy worked last time: They got leftists or
unstable nuts (McCain) with war backgrounds and put some of them into
office even in conservative districts.

The right could theoretically do this as well and use, as you call it
Society, the frontman principle. Get women to act for the right's
interests the way male politicians act for women's interests. The
left
seethed, remember, about Clarence Thomas wandering away? They came out
against him _hard_ because they realized how effective this strategy
was.

There are plenty of strong women, non-racist minorities, and
conservative Jews who would be a kickass force to be dealt with.
Imagine a cabinet comprised of Ben Stein, Ward Connerly, Mark Levine,
Phylis Schlafly, etc.

regards,
PolishKnight

You're wrong, Mark.

The Left has its own way of demonizing "minorities" who don't toe the
line. Look at what they did to Clarence Thomas.

Yes, he became a Supreme Court justice, but only at the expense of his
own peace of mind and the Left and the feminists got repaid by "The
Year of the Woman" which followed.

Anyway, there's no such thing as a "strong woman". There are no
certainly no principled female conservatives. Even to the extent that
any women are generally conservative, they all think with their cunts
anyway.

I would never vote for a woman, no matter what platform she ran on.

What about Ann Coulter? She's anti-suffragist, pro-Isreal,
ultra-conservative, and hot to boot.

Ugh. Far, far, far too thin. Pass. Plus, shes so dumb that she
insisted that
Canadian troops fought in Vietnam...

Plus, she's so dumb that she has several best-selling books, speaking
engagements, and worldwide fame. How many books have you sold, Andre?
Hell, for that matter what show was Ann on when she said that? I'm sure
as many people know that or care about being mistaken about whether the
Canadian troops fought in Vietnam or not.

Nothing is more foolish or "dumb" as someone who knows nothing than
someone who spends hours upon hours reading books and memorizing trivial
facts and doesn't have much more to show for it than the dumb person
they're mocking. Hell, what kind of insecure person needs to go around
bullying someone they think is stupid to begin with?

Sadly, I deal with plenty of these kinds of small minded thinkers in the
form of bureaucrats in D.C... Fortunately, it's not too difficult to get
around, through, or above them. After all, if I'm not smart enough to
whip their tails where it counts then they really do have a point about
thinking small ruling the world, don't they?

About the left demonizing turncoats: Overall, the left demonizes
EVERYONE that opposes them including naive fools such as GW that try to
buddy up with them.

As opposed to "If you're not with us, you support the terrorists" ?

Did GW really say that? I believe he said something like: "You're
either for us or you're against us."

You just launched into a major hissy fit against me for supposedly
misquoting Groucho Marx (which nobody has provided any URL's to support
that I did so) yet you turn around and put words into GW's mouth while
standing on a soapbox.

Amazing.

Three things for sure:

1) You're not going to admit you're mistaken about what GW said (even as
you pontificate about the merits of others admitting they're wrong)
2) You won't address the points I made.
3) You'll preach and pontificate about honor and the importance of
standing your ground and then turn around and plonk me (run away) to
avoid my response.

regards,
PolishKnight
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Madame President - an essay about Hillary Clinton
    ... A female president represents the interests of cunt. ... business would allow GW Bush the same zone of privacy? ... didn't have a combat war record and advocated war was a "chickenhawk". ... certainly no principled female conservatives. ...
    (soc.men)
  • Re: Madame President - an essay about Hillary Clinton
    ... A female president represents the interests of cunt. ... business would allow GW Bush the same zone of privacy? ... didn't have a combat war record and advocated war was a "chickenhawk". ... certainly no principled female conservatives. ...
    (soc.men)
  • THE PLANET IS SHIFTING TO THE RIGHT > > >
    ... Liberalism is DEAD. ... The Conservatives had 36 percent of the vote, according to the BBC, ... noted, in Genesis itself, that God created EVERYTHING. ... from the larger war on terror and from the events of Sept.11. ...
    (soc.politics)
  • The Lefts Stranglehold on the Donkey
    ... pledged "to end the war in Iraq and finally bring home the troops." ... Democrats' incompetence and half-measures toward undermining our war ... homosexual and pro-abortion agendas, further radicalizing the culture ... Without minimizing the real and justified concerns of conservatives ...
    (alt.politics.bush)
  • Re: The Lefts Stranglehold on the Donkey
    ... pledged "to end the war in Iraq and finally bring home the troops." ... Democrats' incompetence and half-measures toward undermining our war ... homosexual and pro-abortion agendas, further radicalizing the culture ... Without minimizing the real and justified concerns of conservatives ...
    (alt.politics.bush)