Re: Blast from the past: Marg promised to leave usenet FOREVER!

In article <pan.2007.06.12.01.07.40.247562@xxxxxxxx>,
pandora <pandora@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 22:13:24 -0400, PolishKnight wrote:

In article <marek1-04583F.20183610062007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
PolishKnight <marek1@xxxxxxx> wrote:

In article <pan.2007.06.10.22.24.41.257657@xxxxxxxx>,
pandora <pandora@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

Ah, the *other* coward who couldn't bear to face questions regarding
his moderation policies of smm. Talk about morally bankrupt. Of
course, I won't bother dealing with the intellectually bankrupt part
as we all know your status in that department. Idiot.

Are you getting ready to run away from me again?

Remember this charming outburst?

"You can all rot in hell, I'm unsubscribing from this newsgroup
FOREVER!"

You were back in a few months...

regards,
PolishKnight

Correction:

As usual you were wrong.

Yeah, but I fixed it on my own and the larger point is still valid. Oh,
but wait, you're a housewife and receptionist and used to cleaning up
trivialities after important people... Could you run this to the
mailroom for me and check the postage honey? :-)

Here's the original post for her promising to unsubscribe from ALL (HER
emphasis strangely enough) newsgroups forever.

Obsess much? That was a long time ago, boyo.

Yeah, but it's still pretty funny. GA's getting a kick out of it. Even
Peter was laughing years later. At you.

Your *kind* doesn't bother
me anymore since I became aware that you're impotent and irrelevant.
Have a nice day, dear.

Yeah, I'm such a non-bother to you that you came back to soc.men after
saying we could go to hell as far as you were concerned. Apparently,
hell lasts about 2 weeks.

Enjoy.

Oh, I have. I wonder if there is an AUK award for someone who goes back
10 years in order to attempt a putdown. If there isn't one, there should
be. We could call it the SLOBBO award after Slobbo here.

AUKers oftentimes have quotes in their sigs of stuff that has long
failed to be interesting to anyone but them. Peter maintains a web page
of old quotes and refers to unverified, unsupported quotes from me on
pages that are no longer maintained.

You attacked my credibility and I one upped you. Deal with it and go
fetch me a beer.

regards,
PolishKnight



http://groups.google.com/group/alt.feminism/msg/91ef64dd795e9838?dmode=so
urce

From: godd...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Marg Petersen) Subject: Re: Carol Ann and
Marg join the Patriarchy (only kidding! :-) Date: 1997/09/18
Message-ID: <5vt4ek$2ac$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 273752445
References: <873915478.26223@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <5vqrsf$qfs$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<34213f45.1160804@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <34216AB8.41CC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Public Electronic Access to Knowledge,Corvallis,US
Newsgroups: alt.feminism,alt.child-support,soc.men

In article <34216AB8.4...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Paul A Laird
<"THELAIRDS$"@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
Charlie Kester wrote:

On 18 Sep 1997 02:22:23 -0700, godd...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Marg Petersen)
wrote:

In article <ms-1709972153240...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mark
Sobolewski <m...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I don't care if a MILLION women die from childbirth complications
today.

Yes, Mark, we know that.

Mark Sobolewski

Marg

Out of all the things in Mark's post, you choose to snip and respond
to this?!? Marg, some of us have threaded newsreaders and can
plainly see that you are ignoring 99.9% of what he wrote.

Please respond to the statistical arguments he raised, or have the
good grace to admit that he's made the stronger case.

charlie

The "snip & clip" trick is one used by Lefty and Marge quite
frequently. If one does not take time to check out what was really
said one could side with them. The very immoral act of this type of
"referencing" has been used against Marge, and she is quite vocal
about its unfairness then. Wonder why it is okay now? Paul L

Excuse me. Are you denying that Mark said the above? Has it ever
occurred to you (or to anyone else) that I was SO incensed by his
remark that I simply felt that there was nothing else that I considered
worthy of saying to him? Nah, it couldn't be that, now could it
because I'm a woman and a woman will *always* talk to a man no matter
how vitriolic he becomes. And you'd much rather (it does fit your
agenda now doesn't it) to assume that I had other ulterior motives. In
answer to your comment (which is also NOT worthy of a response but I
will give it just this once), NO, I had NO intention of doing any
sneaky tricky dicky "snip & clip" in order to impress. I was incensed
and enraged as I believe, any decent human being would be at Mark's
comment; taken in context or without. It (and he) disgust me beyond
words. That is it! No more. You want me to leave the group? Fine,
I'm gone. After this post, I am unsubscribing from ALL newsgroups. You
can ALL fry in hell for all I care and you deserve it.

Marg











--
Marg Petersen Member PSEB: Official Sonneteer JLP-SOL
godd...@xxxxxxxx http://www.peak.org/~goddess
"At ease Ensign, before you sprain something." - Capt. Janeway

.