Re: Woman commits suicide after becoming depressed by her wrinkles

In article <slrnf6mh8b.oje.pjr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Peter J Ross <pjr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In soc.men on Sat, 09 Jun 2007 20:18:06 -0400, PolishKnight
<marek1@xxxxxxx> wrote:

In article <slrnf6m9io.oje.pjr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Peter J Ross <pjr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In soc.men on Sat, 09 Jun 2007 18:00:21 -0400, PolishKnight
<marek1@xxxxxxx> wrote:

In article <slrnf6lldm.oje.pjr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Peter J Ross <pjr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In soc.men on Sat, 09 Jun 2007 12:08:36 -0400, PolishKnight
<marek1@xxxxxxx> wrote:

In article <slrnf6lag7.oje.pjr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Peter J Ross <pjr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In soc.men on Fri, 8 Jun 2007 22:48:47 -0700, Society
<Society@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


"amused onlooker" <null@xxxxxxxx> reported in message
news:yjcai.23692$RP4.21117@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Woman commits suicide after becoming
depressed by her wrinkles

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_a
rti
cle
_id
=460657&in_page_id=1770

A woman [Amanda Barr, 44] who became depressed
that she was losing her youthful looks committed suicide
by lying down in front of a 90mph train, an inquest has heard.

Hmmm. Forcing a person to be the involuntary instrument
of ones own death is a horrible thing to do to that person.
I know of men who drive trains and trucks who have had
other suicides like Ms. Barr step into their path as they
were driving. Those men suffer a deep and anguishing
psychological wound and often a prolonged depression;
many have had to give up well-paying jobs by which they
supported their families because of the aftereffects. The
hardest blow is to the man's masculine nature as a rescuer
and protector; the horrible experience of the machine
under ones control slamming into someone's body and
being unable to do anything to stop or avert the inevitable
and gruesome outcome haunts the thoughts of those men.
The experience replays itself over and over in the minds
of such men who often blame themselves -- unnecessarily,
of course -- for not having been able to do _something_
to save the person who was killed.

Of course, no man has ever killed himself on a railway line, and no
woman has ever driven a train. Both these facts are obvious, as long
as one is a bigoted freak like you.


And no man has ever been a victim of DV as evidenced by "violence
against women" laws.

Was there a sale this week at Non-sequiturs-R-Us?

Indeed: Nowhere in Society's response did he indicate that there never
was a man who killed himself on a railway line or women never drove a
train. You made that one all on your own.

Yes, I do have an evil feminazi habit of connecting the dots and
proving socmen wrong, don't I?

<whining babble snipped>

If you really believed that you had proved anything with such a
response, you wouldn't have needed to cheerlead it.

So tell me how I "cheerleaded" it, Slobbo.

I'm genuinely interested in how your tiny mind works. And so, probably
are the police.

My oh my, I'm really digging into your head now. It's good that you're
asking a kook to provide a rational, coherent argument to justify his
position. Now maybe you'll have something to aspire to. :-)

Feel free to call the police and tell them that I disagree with marital
rape laws and don't even consider them really rape. Or hell, even claim
that I'm a rape advocate. See what they say. Ask them about something
known as the Constitution and the first amendment (here in the states.)

In answer to your challenge, you cheerleaded it by making grandiose
claims of having proved me wrong. If you had proved me wrong, you
wouldn't need to say you did so. It's just one of those things...

Self-denial and empty rhetoric isn't very fulfilling which is why you
need to turn the volume up (kind of like bad rock music. "Our
amplifiers go up to 11!")

Did you know that there's a real St Sobolewski? He's the patron saint
of pathetic ugly men's wife-buying.

Did that outburst make you feel better? Make another one. Maybe it
will work next time...

But you do clearly realize, Peter, at some conscious level that the
issues on soc.men are engaging and interesting and even challenging.

Heh. Hah. Chortle. Oh, tell me more, Slobbo!

If you like, sure. Pick a topic. There's marital rape which seems to
get you, er, excited. Or women having the right to vote. Or women's
equality in the workplace and whether this is good for women or society.
A particular fun topic I had with Sharon was the impact of women's
workplace equality on automobile gasoline consumption and ultimately war
in the middle east.

If you want to make a rational, coherent argument against any of my
positios on those topics I will be happy to engage it. It would be in
YOUR interest to make such a challenge as good as possible.

It's more fun here than just grazing with the herd (and perhaps your
status in that rather unimaginative environment isn't that high.) It's
taken you a couple of years to realize that screaming at the kooks
didn't get you much more higher up in social prestige.

I actually ENJOY reading your posts now rather than just skipping them.
Keep up the good work.

Thanks for your unintentionally informative post, Slobbo. Now *** off
to prison where you belong, wife-rapist.

Now there's a clear cut-and-dried metric we can use to see if you have
"proved socmen wrong". Let's see, am I in prison? No.

You lose that one.

regards,
PolishKnight
.