Re: 400 ?Deadbeat Dads? but not ONE with a Decent Job?
- From: wrat@xxxxxxxxx (the wharf rat)
- Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 19:03:54 +0000 (UTC)
In article <MPG.2078631a234a5bd99898aa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Darling Regan <pennyforyourfoam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hey hon, show me where it said the mothers are not. It's a given that
they are, since the dads are too busy jacking off & being jobless.
If Mom's supporting the kids what do they need dad for?
Obviously, they ARE supporting them, and changing their diapers, and
Show me where it said that.
Like, I'm *sure* mom isn't feeding the kids Costco
mac&cheese while she scoots off to the bingo parlor and afterwards
out for a couple or three 7&7's with her current squeeze. It's
funny how all those saintly responsible upstanding female citizens
end up having children with deadbeat brutes. Maybe they need to
be liberated some more, or somethin.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 400 ?Deadbeat Dads? but not ONE with a Decent Job?
- From: Darling Regan
- Re: 400 ?Deadbeat Dads? but not ONE with a Decent Job?
- References:
- 400 ?Deadbeat Dads? but not ONE with a Decent Job?
- From: MCP
- Re: 400 ?Deadbeat Dads? but not ONE with a Decent Job?
- From: Darling Regan
- Re: 400 ?Deadbeat Dads? but not ONE with a Decent Job?
- From: the wharf rat
- Re: 400 ?Deadbeat Dads? but not ONE with a Decent Job?
- From: Darling Regan
- 400 ?Deadbeat Dads? but not ONE with a Decent Job?
- Prev by Date: Re: 400 ?Deadbeat Dads? but not ONE with a Decent Job?
- Next by Date: Re: 400 ?Deadbeat Dads? but not ONE with a Decent Job?
- Previous by thread: Re: 400 ?Deadbeat Dads? but not ONE with a Decent Job?
- Next by thread: Re: 400 ?Deadbeat Dads? but not ONE with a Decent Job?
- Index(es):