Re: 400 ?Deadbeat Dads? but not ONE with a Decent Job?
- From: "connor_a@xxxxxxxxxxx" <connor_a@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 Mar 2007 01:07:09 -0700
On Mar 31, 5:34 pm, Darling Regan <pennyforyourf...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
In soc.men, MCP <gf010w5...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> frothed most vigorously...
It's nobody's fault that they're losers who can't support their
offspring; should have thought about that before they *unzipped*.
The gals chose to gestate into poverty knowing *zip* support from the
men who didnt want the sprogs would be forthcoming.
A tax payer pill guys can pop before they *** to stop cunts from
gestating is a good idea.
It gives men equality of choice in gestation stakes, something you
bitches dont want to looose control over, eh?
Why are we supposed to feel sorry for those suffering from their own
mistakes? That's life... stop whining.
Did these these guys want the kid or were forced into the position by
the mom?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 400 ?Deadbeat Dads? but not ONE with a Decent Job?
- From: Darling Regan
- Re: 400 ?Deadbeat Dads? but not ONE with a Decent Job?
- From: Society
- Re: 400 ?Deadbeat Dads? but not ONE with a Decent Job?
- References:
- 400 ?Deadbeat Dads? but not ONE with a Decent Job?
- From: MCP
- Re: 400 ?Deadbeat Dads? but not ONE with a Decent Job?
- From: Darling Regan
- 400 ?Deadbeat Dads? but not ONE with a Decent Job?
- Prev by Date: Re: Off with her head
- Next by Date: Re: Off with her head
- Previous by thread: Re: 400 ?Deadbeat Dads? but not ONE with a Decent Job?
- Next by thread: Re: 400 ?Deadbeat Dads? but not ONE with a Decent Job?
- Index(es):