Re: Getting rid of the kooks

On Mar 17, 2:28 am, "Stephen Morgan" <grauniad2libe...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On 16 Mar, 18:53, "Masculist" <MASCUL...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:



<smile> Yeah, that's right, feminism's very survival is censorship
dependent.

All tyranny and government-sponsored deceit is dependant upon terror
and censorship, whether the truth about the hate-filled DV shelter
staff or the truth about who was behind the 9/11 and 7/7 attacks. Or,
indeed, who burned the Reichstag.

Let's stick to the feminist stuff like getting rid of DV shelters.
All the rest wouldn't be possible without it.

Second: the CIA have no reason to disrupt the activities of
feminist groups, who are there puppets, so we get all of their
attention.

Right again. The survival of our feminist State is dependent on the
sugar daddies maintaining the dominant position of their feminist
lackey's.

Indeederino. The State, which we'd all like to be a benevolent
institution that looks after healthcare and all the other
responsibilities of the modern state is, in reality, ruled by the
secret state whose trade is lies and power.

True, anyway the masses can't handle the truth...they're too ***
whipped and hen pecked!

Gee Steve, you're brilliant!

You should here my ideas on syndicalism, the modernisation of
agriculture and so forth. Of course if it wasn't for the government
we'd all know about the emdrive that makes jet engines obsolete, it's
just a question of paying attention.

We're all stupid here Steverino except for when it comes to destroying
the feminist State. Wise men we are then.

Tom



.