Re: Men, finally waking up to the rip-off.......

On Mar 11, 11:49 am, "John D.Wentzky" <johndwent...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
"Hyerdahl" <Hyerda...@xxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:1173637554.582319.3910@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx





On Mar 11, 9:08 am, "John D.Wentzky" <johndwent...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
"Hyerdahl" <Hyerda...@xxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:1173624977.182392.278890@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Mar 11, 5:35 am, "John D.Wentzky" <johndwent...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
"amused onlooker" <n...@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:xsRIh.56532$wP3.46375@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Hyerdahl" <Hyerda...@xxxxxxx> wrote

On Mar 10, 8:23 am, "amused onlooker" <n...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Hyerdahl" <Hyerda...@xxxxxxx> wrote

<snip>

Poor baby; a dose of legal reality is all it takes to "ruin"
your
"sport"; patriarchy is really dead, after all.

Yes your right on that point, the patriarchy is dead.

Cool.

For now.

Forever.

Nah, feminism is an evolutionary dead end.

But when it all starts going wrong soon, either by the eco-system>>>
melting
down or the imposition of a police state then it will be women >>
begging for
the 'old patriarchy' to be re-instated.

So, basically, you're admitting that you are pathetic enough to
need a> catastrophe to be able to CONTROL women. Good to know.

Given enough time I feel that the general population (both men and
women) will wake up to the damage that feminism, permissiveness and>
political > correctness is doing to society as a whole.

Who are _YOU_ to determine what moral code the rest of us should
follow? It appears to me that you are one of those zealots who wish to > impose YOUR moral code on everyone else. I'll tell you what, John...if
you don't pray in my schools, I won't think in your church, and then we > both should be happy. (well unless you're just one> controlling ***)

I didn't write that.

Ok....In that case, it goes to the bitter twitter who DID write it.

But, it will take time and I don't think we've got that much time
left.

Nor do I John. I think you bitter twitters just want to blow things up. You and Bush want to bring about your version of Revelations, >
forcing the "last days" on the rest of us. This doesn't surprise me
as
you religious nutters have always been a danger to normal society.

Do you understand revelations as being a revealing of acts that have
been> hidden?

No. I believe Revelations is just a bitter boy method of control
attempts....

While you think secrecy and control of people other than yourself and
anti-liberty for them is appropriate?

I'm not into controlling anyone or having anyone control me, John. I
want my grandchildren to attend school without being forced to pray to
YOUR godhead. I would think you'd want the same. Do you want your
grandchildren having to pray to the Goddess?


but this time, once we get the truely evil one out of
office, perhaps we can save ourselves by ousting religion permanently
from govt. That would be a start.

Should you be in an atheism group?

I am agnostic, John. But I can post where the subject fits my fancy.

(edit)> >

If all those cushy office and government jobs that so many women> hold> disappear what do you think most women will do?


The same thing all those men who hold those jobs will do, I
suspect...the best they can. And really, that's what women have> > always done, asswipe. Women have survived and they will continue as>> best they can.

Do you think they will continue to whore like they have done for so>> many> years already since ROEVWADE went into effect?

Poor little John, doesn't seem to want to admit that for every whore
there is at least one whoremonger. :-) He conveniently FORGETS that
part. In the meantime, assmunch, women will indeed have sex with the
men THEY choose and not the men you might wish to choose for them. You
can't keep Maggie May down on the farm, so you wish to blow the farm
up. :-) Funny, that. It shows just how insecure you and yours>
really are.

Since when do I wish to blow the farm up?

Since you come here wearing your sack cloth and ashes proposing> Revelations.

Why would you resist any revelations?
Are you telling on yourself?

I'm telling you that I think you're a warmonger, John, hoping against
hope that the Bible is true. I'm not a bible thumper at all.


What makes you 'bitter' about a farmer burning down the food you want to> eatr?> And, are you still living n the sixzties and DEEPTHROAT pornoville?> LOL!

John, men do porn; women make their living and feed their children
from the work. If you're pissed at the pornmeisters, you'll have to
look elsewhere.

Why do you need abortions so much?

Why do you need rights over YOUR body so much, John?
You'll find the answer there.


If you want to control, first control yourself.

My body is within my control, just like yours, John.
The same laws apply.

Why would you be against a farmer exercising his legal right to do with> >> his property as he wishes?

I have no objection to Revelations-bound farmers blowing up their own
property simply because they can't control Maggie May. It just
highlights their vanity and their insecurity.

So, you are content with them destroying the crops you want to purchase at
the grocer?

They can do as they wish, John. I have my own garden.
LOL!

I appreciate your comfort with such an act by rightful property owners.

No problem, john. They own their crops; as do the female farmers of
America.

Are you trying to tell me that you can dictate what others do with their>> >> property as you lobby for abortion on demand?

Choice is the law of the land, bitter twitter.

How am I bitter?

Because you can't command and control women's bodies, John.


Do you routinely assume that anyone who is against killing in utero humans> is bitter?


I assume that folks who want to deny women the same rights men have
are bitter, yes.


Isn't it more the case that you are red in the face or afraid that you will> be found out?

What are you talking about, John? I'm not red in the face. I'm pro
choice. It's those who have the need to control women's bodies and
make women second class citizens who should be embarrassed.

Isn't it more the case that you aer envious of the 'rich' landowners who can> starve you?

I have my own garden, John. I grow lots of fruit and veggies there,
and I catch my own fish as well. I'm not envious at all.


Men can do with their> own property what they wish. But they cannot
do with their wive's> property what they wish...and the most important
possetion each human
being has is their own body.

You are ignoring the common property of the conceived in utero child.

No John. Unless there IS a child, there is no child. And doctors
claim that 2/3 of embroys are naturally and spontaneously aborted
anyway.

You are also ignoring the right of the husband and the wife not to be stolen> from by cheaters.

Husbands have no rights over their wives bodies, John. If you don't
want your jism to go there, put it where it will be better
protected. :-)



.

Loading