Re: Fewer women standing for election
- From: Dustbin <dustbin_address@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 18:55:03 GMT
Viking wrote:
On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 17:22:04 GMT, "MCP" <gf010w5035@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>That's because the only way women can make it is when we help them ;-)
wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/northern_ireland/6417967.stm
God what a sexist article. Note that in one page, it said that females
are discriminated against in politics, that they make better leaders
than men, and that the media should push them on the public more than
they do men.
D.
The reality is clear, however: females just aren't as interested in
standing for election as men. Which makes MP quotas, for example, a
sick joke.
--
=======================
Women have spent the last
30 years proving that men
have been right for the
last 30 centuries.
=======================
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fewer women standing for election
- From: Society
- Re: Fewer women standing for election
- From: Boomerang
- Re: Fewer women standing for election
- References:
- Fewer women standing for election
- From: MCP
- Re: Fewer women standing for election
- From: Viking
- Fewer women standing for election
- Prev by Date: Re: Why not "including 27 men"?
- Next by Date: Re: Iran to Prosecute Women's Rights Activists
- Previous by thread: Re: Fewer women standing for election
- Next by thread: Re: Fewer women standing for election
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading