Re: Freedom


PolishKnight wrote:

I disagree. I think you attack men 'in general" but do so in vague
terms as to appear to only want equality and fairness when in reality
you're out to bash men and go for goodie grabs for women.

You cannot site a single anti-male statement by me - and so you engage
in a dishonest misrepresentation of what I have said.
That's pretty chickenshit on your part.

I deleted a bunch of disingenuous crap - stuff that you know isn't
true.

I've met Jill. I haven't looked under her skirt but other than that I
can vouch that she appears to be a normal woman.

This might be credible - had you not chosen to completely misrepresent
what I have posted on-line. You know that you are grasping at straws to
save your lost arguments. And then you turn to ridiculous ad
hominems...sorry.
Then there is the below statement:

Ironically, you really ought to be embarrassed by women who don't live
up to equality or for that matter, even human standards of decency:
Abandoning babies and letting them die, exploiting unwanted babies for
fun and profit, getting jobs through quotas (off the top of my head)
but you spend more time excusing them rather than being embarrassed or
condemning them. That comes across as stranger than Jill's possible
gender self-hatred. Our culture is filled with women who are
sociopaths when it comes to men and children. Foreign men who come
here marvel and think that the women are mentally ill and engage in
acts of destruction or vengence for no logical reason.

regards,
PolishKnight

If you can mentally justify a massive distortion like the above, you
cannot be considered a reliable witness to anything. I doubt if you
could survive a jury selection examination.

Cat

.