Re: "Death toll of female troops 'troubling'"
- From: the Curmudgeon <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 02:38:15 GMT
"Mike" <yard22192@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:1167191727.173160.113430
@f1g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
Death toll of female troops 'troubling'
By Rowan Scarborough
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
Published December 26, 2006
http://www.washtimes.com/national/20061225-110520-6688r.htm
The number of military service women killed in Iraq and Afghanistan has
reached 70, more than the total from the Korean, Vietnam and Desert
Storm wars.
"Some have argued that the women who have died are no different
than the men," according to a report noting the 70 casualties from the
Center for Military Readiness, which opposes women in combat. "But
deliberate exposure of women to combat violence in war is tantamount to
acceptance of violence against women in general."
Women voluntarily sign on for danger and putting themselves in harm's way.
And now we hear people whining about it. Either accept it, or ban women
from military service altogether. No preferential treatment for anyone on
the basis of gender
the Curmudgeon
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "Death toll of female troops 'troubling'"
- From: PK Smith
- Re: "Death toll of female troops 'troubling'"
- References:
- "Death toll of female troops 'troubling'"
- From: Mike
- "Death toll of female troops 'troubling'"
- Prev by Date: Re: "Women in Science: The Battle Moves to the Trenches"
- Next by Date: Re: article: CIA funded Gloria Steinam to create radical feminism
- Previous by thread: Re: "Death toll of female troops 'troubling'"
- Next by thread: Re: "Death toll of female troops 'troubling'"
- Index(es):