Re: Male teachers 'better for boys'
- From: "Avenger" <stead@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 04:41:01 GMT
Erm male teachers are better for boys AND girls.
"The Curmudgeon" <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:21ibf2l5tg5l82r04v7cgvk8937elr3chi@xxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 07:39:48 GMT, "MCP" <gf010w5035@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/5294854.stm
Boys do better at school when taught by men, while women help improve
girls'
performances, US research suggests.
A study of 25,000 pupils by Stanford University economist Thomas Dee found
children did 4% better in tests when their teachers were of the same
sex. -----
That's why boys are falling behind. And who in their right mind in
this day and age wants to become a primary schoolteacher if they are a
man? All men are considered to be potential pervs so you will never
really be trusted and always under suspicion. It's just not worth
it.....
the Curmudgeon
.
- References:
- Male teachers 'better for boys'
- From: MCP
- Re: Male teachers 'better for boys'
- From: The Curmudgeon
- Male teachers 'better for boys'
- Prev by Date: Re: Why Is A Woman Blogging About Men's Rights?
- Next by Date: Re: Bitter Boys Bite the Dust: was Re: Fugitive polygamist cult leader caught in Nevada
- Previous by thread: Re: Male teachers 'better for boys'
- Next by thread: An open letter from the States on how rape has become the political weapon of feminism
- Index(es):