Re: Male teachers 'better for boys'
- From: The Curmudgeon <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 10:19:21 -0700
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 07:39:48 GMT, "MCP" <gf010w5035@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/5294854.stm
Boys do better at school when taught by men, while women help improve girls'
performances, US research suggests.
A study of 25,000 pupils by Stanford University economist Thomas Dee found
children did 4% better in tests when their teachers were of the same sex. -----
That's why boys are falling behind. And who in their right mind in
this day and age wants to become a primary schoolteacher if they are a
man? All men are considered to be potential pervs so you will never
really be trusted and always under suspicion. It's just not worth
it.....
the Curmudgeon
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Male teachers 'better for boys'
- From: Avenger
- Re: Male teachers 'better for boys'
- References:
- Male teachers 'better for boys'
- From: MCP
- Male teachers 'better for boys'
- Prev by Date: Re: Is it true...
- Next by Date: Re: The Illegal Invasion, a Guerrilla War
- Previous by thread: Male teachers 'better for boys'
- Next by thread: Re: Male teachers 'better for boys'
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|