Re: Hey Jayne, About PJR...



----------
In article <1iuea77m2r6n0$.dlg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Peter J Ross
<pjr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:07:44 -0400, Deborah Terreson wrote:

<...>

In article <slrndfflrg.act.pjr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> , PJR
<pjr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Have you slurped Blob recently, you big old hypocrite? Have you
encouraged a man who wanted all women to be raped and killed to act
out his fantasies by offering him succour at every opportunity? Have
you shared any recipes or dirty jokes with Blob lately?

Or have you merely lied about how you always used to oppose Blob but
the trolls spoiled it?

Fucking hypocritical ***.

I've been reading your recent posts and some of your archived posts,
and my conclusion is that you're a great big heap of hypocritical
pedo-loving scum. Chive may have been wrong about many things, but he
was right about you. *** off and kill yourself, you nasty little pile
of Blob-admiring ***.

Alternatively, you could just net.die instead, the way your best
Usenet friend, Blob, did.

P.S. Keep your misogynist tripe out of news.groups in future, please.

Yours sincerely,
PJR :-)

<...>

Yes, I'd forgotten recently just what a nasty, hypocritical piece of
work you are. Thanks for the reminder.

I am not the hypocrite here Peter J Ross, you are.

Remember this, that not once did I *ever* deem another person's words worthy
of censorship. Even the stuff I found personally revolting - esp, the
revolting comments.

Can the same be said of yourself? Oh, we *love* the free speech of the
internet, just not if it's words and opinions that Peter J Ross finds
objectionable. Then we become a foaming mad dog of bilious, censorious
venom.

And yes, Bob had a damn sight more balls and nerve to speak of the
'forbidden' and evil things - things that men DO reflect upon. Things that
in your little genteel, garden-party 'polite society' world cannot be
mentioned without sanction. After all, we mustn't upset the view men are
only sweetness and light and daffodils and puppy-dog's tails.

In a word, simplistic.

Your safe-'n'-sanitized, politically-correct, banal maxi-pad of a mindset is
showing my love - hell, you wear it like a battle flag. Do try to keep that
unsightly female hygiene product out of sight.

I do not have any faith in your ability to impartially moderate anything,
*least* of all a group dedicated to open discussion.

Like I said; Here comes the Men's Auxiliary of soc.women.

Fortunately, SMM will be blind to the character of posters; only the
overt content of their posts will be taken into account.

Well, let's hope you have better skills at deciphering subtlety and subtext
than you seem to. You don't do subtle, covert content well at all.

Deb.

PJR :-)
--
_ _(o)_(o)_ _ Tired of the same old posters in your
._\`:_ F S M _:' \_, newsgroup? Why not visit news.groups.reviews
/ (`---'\ `-. and attract new talent by posting a review?
,-` _) (_, F_P (Please read the posting guidelines.)
.