Feminist single mum rattles the cage

http://eternalbachelor.blogspot.com/

This is a laughable blog entry by a feminist, basically advising what men should
do when they're about to become a father. It can be best summed up as "Do
everything for the woman, she is the centre of attention, and you have
responsibility for everything, even the child's conception, but *** you if the
women wants to assert her right to have the baby chopped up in her womb and
thrown in a bin."

It's crammed with demands that you pay for YOUR child because it's YOUR
responsibility to SUPPORT YOUR CHILD!!

Yet:


(2) Whether or not she continues the pregnancy is HER decision. Your rights
over her body are precisely ZERO and you get precisely NO say over whether she
has the baby or not.


Yup, screw you father-to-be (or not-to-be, if the baby is butchered on the
woman's whim), it's her body and you have "ZERO" rights. You've got skipfuls of
responsibility of course, that's what us men are apparantly here for, to be
responsible for women and babies and support them, but, evidently, we can go and
*** off if we think for a moment we have any rights.


Do NOT assume that your partner is the only one who needs to take a hit on her
career. You too could return to work part time. You too could arrange to leave
work promptly to pick up your child from the childminder. This is not your
partner's sole responsibility.


Yeah, that sounds fair enough, but seriously, imagine a guy suggesting he'll
work part-time once the baby is born. Watch wifey look in horror; "But how will
we get by? You're a man, you have to support YOUR baby. Get back to work!
Support me and MY...I mean, YOUR, babeeeeh!"

Anyway, here we go for what is probably the most laughable bit of the whole
thing:


Discuss openly and honestly how the two of you are going to arrange childcare
if and when your partner is ready to return to paid employment. Do not balance
her prospective wages against the cost of childcare because, guess what?, it's
your baby too and you are 50% responsible for childcare. So balance her
prospective wages against half the cost of childcare. The other half comes out
of your pay packet. Which means that if your partner does not return to work, or
works only part-time, in order to care for your child, you should pay to HER the
cost of childcare that YOU are saving.


This is, without a doubt, the greatest example of entitlement and greed I've
heard from a feminist, and that's saying something! She basically thinks that,
if a woman has a kid and eagerly quits the boring job she hated, I mean,
sacrifices her career to stay at home, then her husband should pay her to stay
at home.

Pay her. Cash.

That is to say, a salary.

That's on top of supporting her and the baby as well, by providing a roof over
their heads, paying the bills, pay for food.

Not only is this immeasurably greedy and making it clear this woman sees babies
as a burden to women (she's a single mother too; I feel sorry for the poor kid)
but she has no sense of practicality. With women flooding the workplace and the
growing army of single mothers leeching off the state and causing higher taxes,
it's difficult enough for the average guy to support a wife and child on his
salary alone, yet she expects the guy to pay the woman a salary!?! For fucks
sake. The average childcare cost in the UK is £7,400 per year (about US$14,000.)
How many guys could afford, on their salary, to support themselves, a wife, a
child, make the mortgage payments, run a car or two and pay his wife a £7,400
salary to do something women used to do in return for being support by her
husband!? Bear in mind her advice elsewhere says, except for breastfeeding, the
father should do "everything else." Oh yeah, sounds like a sweet deal to me; pay
a woman a salary just to breast feed a baby whilst I do "everything else" and
work full-time to support her and the baby. For fucks sake.

The only way a guy could do that is to make the woman pay rent, pay for the food
he buys and she shares and use of the car and furniture. She'll end up owing him
money! Of course, this suggestion would be met with horror by women; "You're my
boyfriend/husband, you're obligated to support me!!! I'm not obligated to do a
thing for you, not even look after your child (it's yours now it needs
supporting, it'll be mine when I divorce you). Not unless you pay me anyway!"

She also doesn't even bother suggesting a guy should stick around necessarily.
That would be one piece of advice it would be nice (albeit unlikely) to see;
stick around guys because children need fathers. Instead, in her last entry, she
merely implies that if a guy decides to "up and leave" it's no problem at all,
so long as he pays Child Support. That's all us men are to women like this,
sperm donors and walking wallets.

Such crap like her article would have annoyed me a year or two ago, but now it
just makes me laugh. I was going to try and leave some cluebatting comments, but
can't be arsed. She's a feminist so is immune to logic or A Different Opinion.
There's no point in communicating with such people. Let these single-mother
feminists grow old and alone. Maybe when their bastards have fled the nest (or
gone to prison or become a single mother on welfare) they might have the time
and introspection to figure out that their sense of extreme entitlement and
obnxious attitudes are why no man wants them.

To balance things up, here's my advice on How To Be Total Git At Fatherhood: do
whatever you like. Don't bother going to pre-natal classes, don't change
nappies, call her fatty, refuse to accept her invitation for the "privilege" of
watching her give birth and instead go to the pub with your mates, make her and
the baby sleep in the basement so the child's crying doesn't disturb your beauty
sleep, ditch mother and baby if you want and don't pay any Child Support. And if
the woman complains about your behaviour, tell her "Hey, it's MY body and MY
life, you have ZERO rights over it and you get precisely NO say over whether I
support you or not. *** you very much and get off my property."

Obviously that above paragraph is in jest; I think most guys instinctively know
how to be good fathers and many - including me - would like to be fathers, and
good ones too. But we can't be. Not in the Matriarchy. Children belong to women.
They have the say in whether they're aborted, they get to keep them in any
custody battles. Fathers are of no relevance. The British government confirmed
this attitude the other week by declaring single women and lesbians could get
IVF treatment at taxpayers expense, based on the apparant irrelevance of
fathers. Yet they'll wonder why the young men of Britain become ever more
nihilistic.

(Thanks to Maximus at Kitten News for sending me the link).

posted by Duncan Idaho @ 9:20 PM 1 comments

.

Loading