Re: In Defense of Book Burning (was Re: Sharon chickens out (was Re: PING: Ben [was Re: The Failure of Feminism]
- From: PolishKnight <marek1@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 11:13:39 -0400
In article <djia92psqbn4kg6ojrkumi4vilhpadqbbu@xxxxxxx>,
Sharon B <sharon@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 21:55:38 -0400, PolishKnight <marek1@xxxxxxx>
wrote in <marek1-012621.21553812062006@news>:
[...]
The policy is quite simply that if a book is destroyed,
the library patron has to compensate them for the loss.
There is no special case made for burning the book
or otherwise deliberately destroying it.
Likewise, there is no special case made in the library policy to
address breaking down the doors to get a book in the middle of the
night--and for the same reason, you utter dumbazz.
Perhaps because there isn't such a policy, "dumbazz."
You lose. Try to accept it gracefully, ok?
regards,
PolishKnight
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: Sharon chickens out (was Re: PING: Ben [was Re: The Failure of Feminism]
- From: knoxy
- In Defense of Book Burning (was Re: Sharon chickens out (was Re: PING: Ben [was Re: The Failure of Feminism]
- From: PolishKnight
- Re: In Defense of Book Burning (was Re: Sharon chickens out (was Re: PING: Ben [was Re: The Failure of Feminism]
- From: Sharon B
- Re: Sharon chickens out (was Re: PING: Ben [was Re: The Failure of Feminism]
- Prev by Date: Re: Feminists have made it their main target.
- Next by Date: Re: Women More Comfortable With Single Life
- Previous by thread: Re: In Defense of Book Burning (was Re: Sharon chickens out (was Re: PING: Ben [was Re: The Failure of Feminism]
- Next by thread: Re: In Defense of Book Burning (was Re: Sharon chickens out (was Re: PING: Ben [was Re: The Failure of Feminism]
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
