Re: The Failure of Feminism

In article <753172tuo7f8pm6si31cjrp26rkr484opr@xxxxxxx>,
Sharon B <sharon@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Sun, 21 May 2006 11:19:20 -0400, PolishKnight <marek1@xxxxxxx>
wrote in <marek1-8A5C3B.11192021052006@news>:

In article <h48q62t60nb77lj3r870n91hskn5uhi9ud@xxxxxxx>,
Sharon B <sharon@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Thu, 18 May 2006 20:13:08 -0400, PolishKnight <marek1@xxxxxxx>
wrote in <marek1-DBFB76.20130818052006@news>:

[speaking to Hyerdahl]
Try this: Go spit in front of a policeman and then tell
him there's nothing he can do about it. I'll burn a book
right in front of him with a copy of the library policy
that holds me responsible to pay for it and with the check
in hand.

See which of us gets a ticket.

She may or may not get a ticket (you shouldn't presume that all
jurisdictions have a ban on spitting, or that LEO would want to deal
with the paperwork of enforcing an archaic law--that law was created
back when women had long gowns that would drag the boardwalks).

She argued about the spitting law and for that matter
even the library book law. Take it up with her.

Ah, but 'tis YOU who implied she would get a ticket and you would get
diddly.

[assuming she even said what you claimed, which is doubtful cuz you
all the time make up stuff that other people say]

*YOU* will get arrested.

Dumbazz.

It's very important to you to assert that those
who disagree with you are stupid, or "dumb".

Clearly, an admission that you think you're allowed by law to walk up
to cops and burn library books in front of them.

Provided the burning itself doesn't present a safety hazard,
I don't see why not.

Besides, I didn't say you were "dumb", I said you are a "dumbazz"
Quote correctly.

And this is important, how?

I notice you didn't address my point.

Does this somehow make you smart?

Guess again!

Indeed! It doesn't make you any smarter.

But please, by all means, don't take my word for it...try it yourself
and find out.

So if you're so superior to "dumb" people, provide a cite
of some kind to support your position. That would
be "kewl".

You want me to spend my time digging up statutes that ban the
destruction of public property, arson and illegal open fires?

Translation: Sharon's a juvenile dumbazz (<-- that ok?) who
can't back up what she just claimed so she's going to
weasle out of it by saying it's too much of a bother.

Are you serious? Common sense just is not your friend, is it?

The library apparently isn't your friend either.

regards,
PolishKnight
.

Relevant Pages