Re: Differences in Aptitude


abb wrote:

"Well, when you consider that women have historically been denied
rights> for, property ownership,"

Not much and not really and certainly less than lots of particular
groups, esp. ethnic groups. Women are about the last in line.

So you say, and yet being female vs being male is, perhaps, even more
discernable and discriminating, than being ...say Asian vs. White. The
first thing we may notice about a person is whether they are female or
male. In that sense, itis very easy to discriminate.
And, you can't deny that women have been denied all those rights based
on the very FACT that they are female.


And now this again:

http://www.lagriffedulion.f2s.com/mathfig1.gif

You cut it obviously, but it shows that there are solid biological
reasons why women were and still are simply less capable on average.

Your 'offering' did not show that tho. It showed a scale where women
were higher at some points and lower at others. And, I didn't cut
anything. Plus, if women have been kept back (and they have) it would
make sense they would do less well.

"the vote,"

..except they were not, not more than other women.

We were comparing women against MEN were we not? Then why do you
suggest that we NOW compare women with other women?


And now this again:

http://www.lagriffedulion.f2s.com/mathfig1.gif

You cut it obviously, but it shows that there are solid biological
reasons why women were and still are simply less capable on average.

"it stands to reason that feminists think women have been shortchanged.
:-) :-) :-)"

No, it doesn't stand to reason, it only stands to feminist mythology.
Which is on it way out, due to factors including but not limited to
this:

Ah, but I have already PROVEN beyond doubt that women HAVE been
shortchanged in being denied equal opportunities and rights in voting,
working and educating, and even in matters of property rights and over
their own bodies.


And now this again:

http://www.lagriffedulion.f2s.com/mathfig1.gif

You cut it obviously, but it shows that there are solid biological
reasons why women were and still are simply less capable on average.

I did not cut anything, dear.


Feminists can lose various arguments, but not this one - this is the
crucial assumption, one they simply cannot abandon. It is not
surprising then that materials like this are routinely ignored and
covered up:

"Let's try again."

Certainly:


And now this again:

http://www.lagriffedulion.f2s.com/mathfig1.gif

"just look at what's going on right now, on college campuses.

Yes, women getting lots of useless "degrees" like liberal arts and
other bull*** that is worthless for doing real jobs in marketplace,
because women apparently lack the following skills NOT due to cultural
reasons:

:-) Sounds an awful lot like sour grapes to me. Women are advancing,
buying their own houses, keeping their own jobs, educating themselves,
having their own families and it's just sour grapes that you call such
"useless". :-) I find it amusing.


http://www.lagriffedulion.f2s.com/mathfig1.gif

.