Re: Kissing Abuse!

MCP wrote:
http://www.angryharry.com/index.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/02/22/nkiss22.xml&s***=/news/2006/02/22/ixnewstop.html

Notice how the public is purposely hoodwinked by the phrase 'sexual
assault and battery' into believing that this man has committed a crime
that is far more serious than the one that he allegedly committed. The
idea behind this is to demonise most horribly those men who have
committed even the most trivial of 'abuse' offences.

Furthermore, notice that if this man had actually been found guilty, his
criminal record would have said convicted of 'sexual assault and
battery'.

For a kiss!

And, of course, he would probably have gone on the Sex Offenders
Register.

"Assault" -> abuse, assail, bash, blast, blitz, bushwhack, invade, lay
into, rape, ruin, set upon, shoot down, slam, slap around, storm,
strike, trash, violate, work over, zap

"Batter" -> bash, beat, break, bruise, clobber, cripple, crush,
demolish, destroy, disable, disfigure, lacerate, mangle, mar, maul,
mutilate, pelt, pommel, pound, pummel, punish, ruin, shatter, smash,
thrash, wallop, wreck

In general, "assault and battery" to most people will convey the notion
of a continued and prolonged act of serious beating.

And some people wonder why I have such utter contempt for politicians
and for the so-called 'justice' system.

Huh!

And please remember that virtually all the 'abuse' terminology is
designed to magnify enormously the crimes that it relates to.

Having a conviction for 'domestic violence' might mean nothing more than
that the 'criminal' shouted at his partner.

Having a conviction for 'rape' might mean nothing more than that the
'criminal' fingered his partner's anatomy for a nano-second.

Having a conviction for 'child abuse' might mean nothing more than that
the 'criminal' smacked his child's bottom as a punishment.

And, of course, bearing in mind that less extreme things tend to happen
far more often than do more extreme things, the 'extreme terminology' is
clearly a determined attempt to make the majority of 'abuse' crimes
sound like the minority of 'abuse' crimes.

This is nothing less than purposeful, willful, deceit.


When the article is read we find that the woman's husband committed a criminal assault against the postman. This, it seems, was not prosecuted.

Once again the trivial is to be prosecuted while the serious crime is ignored.

D.
--
=======================
Women have spent the last
30 years proving that men
have been right for the
last 30 centuries.
=======================
.

Quantcast